Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mc Inerney Graham's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mc Inerney Graham's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mc Inerney Graham's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mc Inerney Graham's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:21. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:51 | 46:13 to 43:22 | 44.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:43 | 07:07 to 05:24 | 27.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:40 | 03:33 to 02:53 | 10.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:35 | 07:05 to 06:30 | 9.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:28 | 02:38 to 02:10 | 7.3% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:54 to 04:50 | 1.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Mc Inerney Graham | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:16 | 00:00 | 04:47 -01:31 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:04 | 03:16 | 04:30 -00:26 | 04:47 -01:31 |
| Running 2 | 05:30 | 07:20 | 05:07 +00:23 | 09:17 -01:57 |
| Sled Push | 03:33 | 12:50 | 03:03 +00:30 | 14:24 -01:34 |
| Running 3 | 06:02 | 16:23 | 05:36 +00:26 | 17:27 -01:04 |
| Sled Pull | 04:54 | 22:25 | 05:12 -00:18 | 23:03 -00:38 |
| Running 4 | 06:14 | 27:19 | 05:35 +00:39 | 28:15 -00:56 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:07 | 33:33 | 05:42 +01:25 | 33:50 -00:17 |
| Running 5 | 06:35 | 40:40 | 05:47 +00:48 | 39:32 +01:08 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 47:15 | 04:54 +00:00 | 45:19 +01:56 |
| Running 6 | 06:12 | 52:09 | 05:36 +00:36 | 50:13 +01:56 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:38 | 58:21 | 02:17 +00:21 | 55:49 +02:32 |
| Running 7 | 06:14 | 01:00:59 | 05:35 +00:39 | 58:06 +02:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:07 | 01:07:13 | 05:26 -01:19 | 01:03:41 +03:32 |
| Running 8 | 06:14 | 01:11:20 | 06:16 -00:02 | 01:09:07 +02:13 |
| Wall Balls | 07:05 | 01:17:34 | 06:54 +00:11 | 01:15:23 +02:11 |
| Roxzone | 05:07 | 01:29:37 | 07:20 -02:13 | 01:29:37 |
It is important to note that Graham's overall running time was 3 minutes and 37 seconds slower than the average, indicating a potential need for improvement in his running ability. Additionally, his Roxzone time was 1 minute and 59 seconds faster than average, suggesting that he may have taken longer rest periods or had slower transitions between exercise zones. To enhance his performance, Graham should focus on improving his overall fitness and reducing his transition time.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas of improvement, Graham Mc Inerney can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Seebode Denis | 2023 Hamburg | 01:29:09 | |
| Daley Andrew | 2024 Manchester | 01:29:19 | |
| Brunner Alexander | 2018 Wien | 01:29:27 | |
| Cunningham Graeme | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:38 | |
| Willesch Alexander | 2023 München | 01:30:04 | |
| Narros John | 2024 Madrid | 01:29:58 | |
| Holdaway Paul | 2023 London | 01:29:49 | |
| Antwi Nana Owusu | 2024 Stockholm | 01:29:49 | |
| Boinet Cedric | 2023 Valencia | 01:29:09 | |
| Ng Dzul Helmi | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:29:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:20:59 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
