Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Low Christopher's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Low Christopher's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Low Christopher's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Low Christopher's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:52 | 51:44 to 45:52 | 85.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:50 | 06:28 to 05:38 | 12.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:46 to 04:35 | 2.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:45 to 02:45 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:39 to 01:39 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:43 to 06:43 | 0.0% |
| Low Christopher | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:12 | 00:00 | 04:57 -00:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:46 | 04:12 | 04:35 +00:11 | 04:57 -00:45 |
| Running 2 | 05:52 | 08:58 | 05:23 +00:29 | 09:32 -00:34 |
| Sled Push | 02:45 | 14:50 | 03:13 -00:28 | 14:55 -00:05 |
| Running 3 | 06:35 | 17:35 | 05:51 +00:44 | 18:08 -00:33 |
| Sled Pull | 04:59 | 24:10 | 05:33 -00:34 | 23:59 +00:11 |
| Running 4 | 06:36 | 29:09 | 05:52 +00:44 | 29:32 -00:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:35 | 35:45 | 06:15 -00:40 | 35:24 +00:21 |
| Running 5 | 06:42 | 41:20 | 06:06 +00:36 | 41:39 -00:19 |
| Rowing | 04:55 | 48:02 | 05:03 -00:08 | 47:45 +00:17 |
| Running 6 | 06:42 | 52:57 | 05:54 +00:48 | 52:48 +00:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:39 | 59:39 | 02:26 -00:47 | 58:42 +00:57 |
| Running 7 | 06:52 | 01:01:18 | 05:53 +00:59 | 01:01:08 +00:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:28 | 01:08:10 | 05:52 +00:36 | 01:07:01 +01:09 |
| Running 8 | 08:16 | 01:14:38 | 06:50 +01:26 | 01:12:53 +01:45 |
| Wall Balls | 06:43 | 01:22:54 | 07:34 -00:51 | 01:19:43 +03:11 |
| Roxzone | 05:57 | 01:35:25 | 08:08 -02:11 | 01:35:25 |
Christopher Low demonstrated a commendable effort in the 2024 Sydney Hyrox race, placing in the top 52% overall and 54% within his age group. His overall time of 01:35:25 reflects a solid performance, with notable strengths in segments requiring strength and power, such as sled push and farmers carry. However, his total running time was 04:34 slower than the average, indicating a need for improvement in running endurance and pacing. Christopher started the race strong with a fast initial run but slowed significantly in subsequent running segments, suggesting a pacing issue where he might have started too fast, which affected his endurance in later stages. His profile leans more towards strength, as seen in his strong performance in exercises like the sled push, sled pull, and wall balls, but there's potential for improvement in his running capabilities to enhance his hybrid athlete profile.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| King Gareth | 2024 Glasgow | 01:35:51 | |
| Körner Stefan | 2019 Wien | 01:35:10 | |
| Smith Samuel | 2023 Melbourne | 01:35:23 | |
| Oldenburg Tim | 2024 Poznan | 01:35:32 | |
| Bryson Jamie | 2024 Glasgow | 01:35:31 | |
| Forsyth Jordan | 2024 Glasgow | 01:35:03 | |
| Caabay Ronald | 2023 Stockholm | 01:35:43 | |
| Wilde John | 2022 London | 01:35:18 | |
| Gijsman Jeroen | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:35:08 | |
| Beevor Ian | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:35:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
