Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 648 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Glynn Rich's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Glynn Rich's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Glynn Rich's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Glynn Rich's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:29 | 09:27 to 06:58 | 38.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:15 | 09:49 to 07:34 | 35.2% |
| Wall Balls | 01:05 | 10:17 to 09:12 | 16.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:33 | 03:24 to 02:51 | 8.6% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 05:24 to 05:22 | 0.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:13 to 02:13 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:07 to 05:07 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 51:38 to 51:38 | 0.0% |
| Glynn Rich | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:54 | 00:00 | 05:31 +00:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:41 | 05:54 | 04:49 -00:08 | 05:31 +00:23 |
| Running 2 | 05:20 | 10:35 | 06:06 -00:46 | 10:20 +00:15 |
| Sled Push | 02:13 | 15:55 | 03:49 -01:36 | 16:26 -00:31 |
| Running 3 | 05:37 | 18:08 | 06:51 -01:14 | 20:15 -02:07 |
| Sled Pull | 05:07 | 23:45 | 06:38 -01:31 | 27:06 -03:21 |
| Running 4 | 05:42 | 28:52 | 06:47 -01:05 | 33:44 -04:52 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:49 | 34:34 | 07:45 +02:04 | 40:31 -05:57 |
| Running 5 | 06:32 | 44:23 | 07:11 -00:39 | 48:16 -03:53 |
| Rowing | 05:24 | 50:55 | 05:23 +00:01 | 55:27 -04:32 |
| Running 6 | 06:04 | 56:19 | 06:53 -00:49 | 01:00:50 -04:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:24 | 01:02:23 | 02:46 +00:38 | 01:07:43 -05:20 |
| Running 7 | 06:36 | 01:05:47 | 06:57 -00:21 | 01:10:29 -04:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 09:27 | 01:12:23 | 07:16 +02:11 | 01:17:26 -05:03 |
| Running 8 | 09:55 | 01:21:50 | 08:32 +01:23 | 01:24:42 -02:52 |
| Wall Balls | 10:17 | 01:31:45 | 09:20 +00:57 | 01:33:14 -01:29 |
| Roxzone | 10:56 | 01:52:51 | 10:17 +00:39 | 01:52:51 |
Rich Glynn's overall performance in the Hyrox race was commendable. He managed to rank in the top 92% overall and in the top 95% within his age group. His total running time of 00:51:38 was 03:29 faster than average, suggesting that his running ability is a key strength. With his best running lap being 00:05:20, it's clear that he has strong endurance and speed when it comes to running. However, there is room for improvement in some segments, particularly in his roxzone time, which was 00:41 slower than average.
Looking at his pacing, it seems Rich started a bit slow with his first running segment being 00:24 slower than average. However, he managed to pick up speed in the following segments, consistently running faster than average. This indicates that he may benefit from starting faster in future races. His stronger performances in running segments suggest a runner profile. However, the slower roxzone time indicates a need for improving his overall fitness and transitions.
For better performance in future races, Rich might want to consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ponte Rafael | 2023 Barcelona | 01:52:58 | |
| Scharek Stephan | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:53:03 | |
| Domin Simon | 2024 London | 01:52:26 | |
| Gerdes Torsten | 2024 Hamburg | 01:52:53 | |
| Cosham Sam | 2024 Melbourne | 01:52:22 | |
| Perez Martinez Raul | 2022 Valencia | 01:52:55 | |
| Tan Jin Han | 2024 Singapore | 01:52:26 | |
| Gadioli Jim | 2024 Rimini | 01:53:03 | |
| Cuk Vujadin | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:53:16 | |
| Wilson Adrian | 2023 Birmingham | 01:52:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
