Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 761 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Krautheimer Angelika's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Krautheimer Angelika's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Krautheimer Angelika's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Krautheimer Angelika's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:23 | 07:15 to 05:52 | 43.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:00 | 08:17 to 07:17 | 31.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:33 | 06:05 to 05:32 | 17.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:39 to 02:28 | 5.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 05:22 to 05:20 | 1.1% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 05:39 to 05:38 | 0.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:30 to 02:30 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:29 to 06:29 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 46:41 to 46:41 | 0.0% |
| Krautheimer Angelika | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:05 | 00:00 | 05:37 -00:32 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:22 | 05:05 | 05:20 +00:02 | 05:37 -00:32 |
| Running 2 | 05:33 | 10:27 | 06:08 -00:35 | 10:57 -00:30 |
| Sled Push | 02:30 | 16:00 | 03:09 -00:39 | 17:05 -01:05 |
| Running 3 | 06:10 | 18:30 | 06:28 -00:18 | 20:14 -01:44 |
| Sled Pull | 06:29 | 24:40 | 06:44 -00:15 | 26:42 -02:02 |
| Running 4 | 06:09 | 31:09 | 06:32 -00:23 | 33:26 -02:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:17 | 37:18 | 07:35 +00:42 | 39:58 -02:40 |
| Running 5 | 05:42 | 45:35 | 06:43 -01:01 | 47:33 -01:58 |
| Rowing | 05:39 | 51:17 | 05:41 -00:02 | 54:16 -02:59 |
| Running 6 | 05:46 | 56:56 | 06:35 -00:49 | 59:57 -03:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:39 | 01:02:42 | 02:31 +00:08 | 01:06:32 -03:50 |
| Running 7 | 05:29 | 01:05:21 | 06:34 -01:05 | 01:09:03 -03:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:05 | 01:10:50 | 05:42 +00:23 | 01:15:37 -04:47 |
| Running 8 | 06:50 | 01:16:55 | 07:14 -00:24 | 01:21:19 -04:24 |
| Wall Balls | 07:15 | 01:23:45 | 06:06 +01:09 | 01:28:33 -04:48 |
| Roxzone | 12:06 | 01:42:58 | 08:19 +03:47 | 01:42:58 |
Her total running time of 00:46:41 was particularly impressive, being 03:15 faster than the average. This indicates that Angelika has a strong running profile and should continue to focus on improving her running abilities. Her best running lap of 00:05:05 further highlights her running prowess.
In conclusion, Angelika Krautheimer performed well in the 2021 Hamburg HYROX race, particularly excelling in the running segments. To improve her overall performance, she should focus on improving her transition efficiency, strength in upper body exercises, explosive power, and lower body stability. Implementing strategies such as pacing, transition efficiency, and mental preparation will contribute to further enhancing her performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Owen Abbie | 2024 Melbourne | 01:42:52 | |
| Gassner Kathrin | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:43:11 | |
| Korsten Claudia | 2024 Maastricht | 01:42:42 | |
| Flickinger Lacey | 2024 Houston | 01:42:45 | |
| Sopata Theresa | 2022 Chicago | 01:42:53 | |
| Alberda Romy | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:42:43 | |
| Benz Mercedes | 2024 Köln | 01:42:54 | |
| Porumbel Mili | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:42:28 | |
| Chua Kit Ying | 2024 Singapore | 01:43:01 | |
| De Haas Deborah | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:42:31 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
