Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:15 (From 48:13 to 42:58) | 84.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:24 (From 02:46 to 02:22) | 6.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:23 (From 02:24 to 02:01) | 6.2% |
| BBJ | 00:05 (From 05:21 to 05:16) | 1.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 (From 04:59 to 04:55) | 1.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 04:04 to 04:04) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:56 to 04:56) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 03:36 to 03:36) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 03:28 to 03:28) | 0.0% |
| Harris Annabel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:57 | 00:00 | 05:00 -00:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:59 | 04:57 | 05:01 -00:02 | 05:00 -00:03 |
| Running 2 | 04:48 | 09:56 | 05:15 -00:27 | 10:01 -00:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:46 | 14:44 | 02:37 +00:09 | 15:16 -00:32 |
| Running 3 | 05:15 | 17:30 | 05:31 -00:16 | 17:53 -00:23 |
| Sled Pull | 04:04 | 22:45 | 05:25 -01:21 | 23:24 -00:39 |
| Running 4 | 05:31 | 26:49 | 05:33 -00:02 | 28:49 -02:00 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:21 | 32:20 | 05:40 -00:19 | 34:22 -02:02 |
| Running 5 | 05:42 | 37:41 | 05:40 +00:02 | 40:02 -02:21 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 43:23 | 05:16 -00:20 | 45:42 -02:19 |
| Running 6 | 05:34 | 48:19 | 05:34 +00:00 | 50:58 -02:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:24 | 53:53 | 02:10 +00:14 | 56:32 -02:39 |
| Running 7 | 10:01 | 56:17 | 05:33 +04:28 | 58:42 -02:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:36 | 01:06:18 | 04:29 -00:53 | 01:04:15 +02:03 |
| Running 8 | 06:28 | 01:09:54 | 05:56 +00:32 | 01:08:44 +01:10 |
| Wall Balls | 03:28 | 01:16:22 | 04:36 -01:08 | 01:14:40 +01:42 |
| Roxzone | 06:00 | 01:25:42 | 06:26 -00:26 | 01:25:42 |
Annabel's best running lap was 00:04:48, indicating her ability to maintain a fast pace during certain segments of the race. However, she also had some segments where she performed slower than the average, such as Running 1 and Burpees Broad Jump.
To improve in the Run Total segment, Annabel should focus on improving her overall fitness and transition time. This can be achieved by incorporating high-intensity interval training (HIIT) workouts, such as sprint intervals, into her training routine. Additionally, practicing quick transitions between exercises and minimizing rest periods will help her improve her overall time in this segment.
For Running 7 and Running 8, Annabel should work on her running endurance and speed. Incorporating long-distance runs into her training routine will help improve her endurance, while interval training, such as hill sprints or tempo runs, will help increase her speed. Additionally, focusing on proper running form and technique, such as maintaining an efficient stride and posture, can also help improve her running performance in these segments.
For Burpees Broad Jump, Annabel should focus on improving her explosive power and agility. Incorporating exercises such as plyometric training, jump squats, and box jumps into her training routine will help enhance her power and explosiveness. Additionally, practicing proper form and technique for the burpee broad jump, ensuring a smooth and efficient movement pattern, will help improve her performance in this segment.
Annabel should also pay attention to her transitions between exercises in order to minimize time spent in the Roxzone. Practicing quick and efficient transitions during training will help her save valuable time during the race.
In addition, Annabel should create a race strategy that capitalizes on her strengths. Based on her overall performance and splits analysis, it appears that she has a better running profile compared to strength exercises. Therefore, she should focus on maintaining a strong pace during the running segments and utilize her running ability to gain an advantage. However, it is still important for her to continue training her strength to improve her performance in the strength exercises and achieve a well-rounded overall performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lammers Anouk | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:25:21 | |
| Spekschoor Anouk | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:26:00 | |
| Mousley Eleanor | 2024 London | 01:25:44 | |
| Carbone Elise | 2024 Dubai | 01:25:49 | |
| Gummesson Elisabeth | 2023 Stockholm | 01:25:24 | |
| Garrett Caroline | 2023 London | 01:25:38 | |
| Gee Mellissa | 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:59 | |
| Stone Vikki | 2023 London | 01:25:20 | |
| Adam Diane | 2023 München | 01:25:20 | |
| Berger Nele | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:25:40 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Harris Annabel
