Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 145 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Oreilly Sarah's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Oreilly Sarah's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Oreilly Sarah's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Oreilly Sarah's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:02 | 07:33 to 05:31 | 48.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:11 | 06:43 to 05:32 | 28.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:34 | 07:26 to 06:52 | 13.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:25 | 03:18 to 02:53 | 9.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:36 to 05:36 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:57 to 04:57 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:45 to 43:45 | 0.0% |
| Oreilly Sarah | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:45 | 00:00 | 04:49 -01:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:51 | 03:45 | 04:52 -00:01 | 04:49 -01:04 |
| Running 2 | 05:27 | 08:36 | 05:17 +00:10 | 09:41 -01:05 |
| Sled Push | 03:59 | 14:03 | 04:18 -00:19 | 14:58 -00:55 |
| Running 3 | 05:43 | 18:02 | 05:39 +00:04 | 19:16 -01:14 |
| Sled Pull | 05:36 | 23:45 | 07:12 -01:36 | 24:55 -01:10 |
| Running 4 | 05:50 | 29:21 | 05:43 +00:07 | 32:07 -02:46 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:33 | 35:11 | 05:36 +01:57 | 37:50 -02:39 |
| Running 5 | 05:45 | 42:44 | 05:49 -00:04 | 43:26 -00:42 |
| Rowing | 04:57 | 48:29 | 05:11 -00:14 | 49:15 -00:46 |
| Running 6 | 05:30 | 53:26 | 05:43 -00:13 | 54:26 -01:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:18 | 58:56 | 03:00 +00:18 | 01:00:09 -01:13 |
| Running 7 | 05:29 | 01:02:14 | 05:49 -00:20 | 01:03:09 -00:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:43 | 01:07:43 | 05:38 +01:05 | 01:08:58 -01:15 |
| Running 8 | 06:19 | 01:14:26 | 06:19 +00:00 | 01:14:36 -00:10 |
| Wall Balls | 07:26 | 01:20:45 | 07:06 +00:20 | 01:20:55 -00:10 |
| Roxzone | 06:43 | 01:34:47 | 06:46 -00:03 | 01:34:47 |
Sarah Oreilly delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 64 out of 212 athletes, placing her in the top 30%. Notably, she ranked 18th in her age group (30-34), which is the top 26% among her peers. Her overall time was 01:34:47, and she distinguished herself with a total running time of 00:43:45, which is 01:37 faster than the average. This indicates she has a strong running profile, although there may be room for improvement in certain strength segments. Her initial pacing was aggressive, as seen in the first running segment, where she was significantly faster than average, suggesting a potential need for better energy management throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Llano Llano Nuria | 2021 Madrid | 01:34:41 | |
| Sletten Leasa | 2024 Anaheim | 01:34:17 | |
| Malliff Charlotte | 2024 Birmingham | 01:35:12 | |
| Perillat Clara | 2023 München | 01:35:00 | |
| Calladine Nola | 2022 Las Vegas | 01:34:54 | |
| Kelly Katrina | 2023 Birmingham | 01:34:44 | |
| Hoggarth Beth | 2023 Wien | 01:34:44 | |
| Mcclelland Tracy | 2024 Manchester | 01:35:14 | |
| Dyvrande Marina | 2024 Paris | 01:34:47 | |
| Colabianchi Elena | 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:34:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
