Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Fleming Michael's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Fleming Michael's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Fleming Michael's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Fleming Michael's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:47. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:49 | 46:32 to 43:43 | 58.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:57 | 03:53 to 02:56 | 19.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:32 | 02:43 to 02:11 | 11.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:21 | 05:21 to 05:00 | 7.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:35 to 04:29 | 2.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:02 | 05:31 to 05:29 | 0.7% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:22 to 06:22 | 0.0% |
| Fleming Michael | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:32 | 00:00 | 04:45 -01:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 03:32 | 04:31 +00:04 | 04:45 -01:13 |
| Running 2 | 05:31 | 08:07 | 05:09 +00:22 | 09:16 -01:09 |
| Sled Push | 03:53 | 13:38 | 03:04 +00:49 | 14:25 -00:47 |
| Running 3 | 06:03 | 17:31 | 05:37 +00:26 | 17:29 +00:02 |
| Sled Pull | 05:21 | 23:34 | 05:15 +00:06 | 23:06 +00:28 |
| Running 4 | 06:26 | 28:55 | 05:37 +00:49 | 28:21 +00:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:31 | 35:21 | 05:47 -00:16 | 33:58 +01:23 |
| Running 5 | 06:34 | 40:52 | 05:49 +00:45 | 39:45 +01:07 |
| Rowing | 04:51 | 47:26 | 04:56 -00:05 | 45:34 +01:52 |
| Running 6 | 06:11 | 52:17 | 05:39 +00:32 | 50:30 +01:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:43 | 58:28 | 02:17 +00:26 | 56:09 +02:19 |
| Running 7 | 06:06 | 01:01:11 | 05:38 +00:28 | 58:26 +02:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:31 | 01:07:17 | 05:30 -00:59 | 01:04:04 +03:13 |
| Running 8 | 06:14 | 01:11:48 | 06:20 -00:06 | 01:09:34 +02:14 |
| Wall Balls | 06:22 | 01:18:02 | 07:00 -00:38 | 01:15:54 +02:08 |
| Roxzone | 06:09 | 01:30:23 | 07:29 -01:20 | 01:30:23 |
Splits Analysis:
Looking at the splits, Michael had a strong start with Running 1, completing it in 00:03:32, which was 01:02 faster than the average. His best running lap was also impressive at 00:03:32. However, he faced challenges in Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, Sled Push, Running 2, Farmers Carry, and Running 3, where he lost significant time compared to the average.
In summary, Michael Fleming showed strong performance in certain segments of the Hyrox race, particularly in Running 1. However, he faced challenges in several running and strength-based segments. By focusing on improving endurance, speed, and strength, while implementing effective race strategies, Michael can enhance his overall performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Poetsma Laurens | 2022 Maastricht | 01:30:43 | |
| Schutt Emilio | 2024 Maastricht | 01:30:51 | |
| Huizenga Niek | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:30:46 | |
| Luyten Mike | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:30:52 | |
| Hemming Adam | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:30:31 | |
| Valach Samuel Jozef | 2023 Stockholm | 01:30:41 | |
| Del Carlo Michael | 2024 Milan | 01:30:31 | |
| Pearson Scott | 2024 Melbourne | 01:30:26 | |
| Moore Stephen | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:30:24 | |
| Lennon Eoin | 2024 Madrid | 01:29:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:29:42 | |
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:26:52 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
