Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 740 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Callaghan Shelby's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Callaghan Shelby's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Callaghan Shelby's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Callaghan Shelby's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:21. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:32 | 42:45 to 38:13 | 84.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:21 | 03:53 to 03:32 | 6.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:18 | 02:03 to 01:45 | 5.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:08 | 03:20 to 03:12 | 2.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 01:59 to 01:57 | 0.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:48 to 03:48 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:58 to 03:58 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Callaghan Shelby | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:52 | 00:00 | 04:27 -00:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 03:52 | 04:49 -00:17 | 04:27 -00:35 |
| Running 2 | 05:16 | 08:24 | 04:44 +00:32 | 09:16 -00:52 |
| Sled Push | 01:59 | 13:40 | 02:22 -00:23 | 14:00 -00:20 |
| Running 3 | 05:23 | 15:39 | 04:59 +00:24 | 16:22 -00:43 |
| Sled Pull | 03:48 | 21:02 | 04:42 -00:54 | 21:21 -00:19 |
| Running 4 | 05:23 | 24:50 | 04:58 +00:25 | 26:03 -01:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:58 | 30:13 | 04:43 -00:45 | 31:01 -00:48 |
| Running 5 | 05:46 | 34:11 | 05:05 +00:41 | 35:44 -01:33 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 39:57 | 05:02 -00:17 | 40:49 -00:52 |
| Running 6 | 05:40 | 44:42 | 05:02 +00:38 | 45:51 -01:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:03 | 50:22 | 01:58 +00:05 | 50:53 -00:31 |
| Running 7 | 05:35 | 52:25 | 05:00 +00:35 | 52:51 -00:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:53 | 58:00 | 03:52 +00:01 | 57:51 +00:09 |
| Running 8 | 05:54 | 01:01:53 | 05:16 +00:38 | 01:01:43 +00:10 |
| Wall Balls | 03:20 | 01:07:47 | 03:54 -00:34 | 01:06:59 +00:48 |
| Roxzone | 05:16 | 01:16:14 | 05:21 -00:05 | 01:16:14 |
In the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox event, Shelby Callaghan delivered a commendable performance, finishing 57th overall and 16th in her age group, both placing her in the top 10% of competitors. Her overall time was 01:16:14. Despite her strength in several exercises, her total running time was 00:42:45, which was 02:41 slower than the average, suggesting room for improvement in her running endurance and speed. Shelby showed a stronger profile in strength exercises, indicated by her exceptional performance in the Sled Pull (6th percentile) and Ski Erg (10th percentile). However, her initial running pace was slightly fast, as evidenced by Running 1, but slowed significantly in subsequent segments, suggesting possible fatigue or pacing issues.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Triamvisit Narisararat | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:16:36 | |
| Pickering Ernst Natalie | 2024 Glasgow | 01:16:03 | |
| Castagnino Ilaria | 2024 Turin | 01:16:03 | |
| Herz Emma | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:16:03 | |
| Nisbet Lauren | 2024 Glasgow | 01:15:57 | |
| Wallace Victoria | 2024 Glasgow | 01:16:10 | |
| Benton Kelli | 2024 Dallas | 01:16:40 | |
| MacLean Alies | 2022 Maastricht | 01:15:45 | |
| Norburn Josie | 2024 Manchester | 01:15:59 | |
| Matotek Laura | 2024 Melbourne | 01:15:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
