Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Young Kevin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Young Kevin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Young Kevin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Young Kevin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:17. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:59 | 08:18 to 05:19 | 41.0% |
| Run Total | 02:07 | 47:34 to 45:27 | 29.1% |
| Wall Balls | 01:44 | 08:49 to 07:05 | 23.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:19 | 02:38 to 02:19 | 4.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:42 to 04:34 | 1.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:59 to 02:59 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:26 to 03:26 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Young Kevin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:21 | 00:00 | 04:56 -00:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 04:21 | 04:34 +00:08 | 04:56 -00:35 |
| Running 2 | 05:41 | 09:03 | 05:23 +00:18 | 09:30 -00:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:59 | 14:44 | 03:11 -00:12 | 14:53 -00:09 |
| Running 3 | 06:06 | 17:43 | 05:53 +00:13 | 18:04 -00:21 |
| Sled Pull | 08:18 | 23:49 | 05:31 +02:47 | 23:57 -00:08 |
| Running 4 | 06:01 | 32:07 | 05:52 +00:09 | 29:28 +02:39 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:26 | 38:08 | 06:09 -02:43 | 35:20 +02:48 |
| Running 5 | 06:37 | 41:34 | 06:04 +00:33 | 41:29 +00:05 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 48:11 | 05:01 -00:07 | 47:33 +00:38 |
| Running 6 | 06:04 | 53:05 | 05:54 +00:10 | 52:34 +00:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:38 | 59:09 | 02:24 +00:14 | 58:28 +00:41 |
| Running 7 | 05:59 | 01:01:47 | 05:53 +00:06 | 01:00:52 +00:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:56 | 01:07:46 | 05:46 -00:50 | 01:06:45 +01:01 |
| Running 8 | 06:49 | 01:12:42 | 06:44 +00:05 | 01:12:31 +00:11 |
| Wall Balls | 08:49 | 01:19:31 | 07:25 +01:24 | 01:19:15 +00:16 |
| Roxzone | 06:28 | 01:34:39 | 07:59 -01:31 | 01:34:39 |
Kevin Young displayed an impressive performance at the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event, finishing in the top 37% of 1404 athletes. He achieved an overall time of 01:34:39. His total running time was 00:47:34, which was only 00:44 slower than the average. Kevin's best running lap was completed in 00:05:41.
Kevin's performance indicates a strength in his running ability. Despite his total running time being slightly slower than average, he consistently showed strong running times throughout the event. However, it seems Kevin began the race at a faster pace than average, which could have contributed to slower times in later running segments. This suggests that he may need to focus on pacing strategies to maintain a more consistent speed throughout the race.
For better performance in future races, Kevin should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sørensen Michael | 2024 Stockholm | 01:34:40 | |
| Snelling Lee | 2022 Birmingham | 01:34:58 | |
| Kopp Christian | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:34:56 | |
| Yngve Oscar | 2024 Stockholm | 01:34:14 | |
| Kerr Robert | 2024 Manchester | 01:34:51 | |
| Szczykutowicz Maciej | 2023 Warschau | 01:34:32 | |
| Jordon Martin | 2022 Birmingham | 01:34:23 | |
| Gonzalez Caro Inyaki | 2023 Barcelona | 01:34:09 | |
| Jaeger Sven | 2022 Maastricht | 01:34:43 | |
| Zwaan Twan | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:35:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
