Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire White Alan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights White Alan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the White Alan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve White Alan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:44 | 07:46 to 05:02 | 80.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:34 | 05:26 to 04:52 | 16.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:03 | 04:43 to 04:40 | 1.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:03 | 06:09 to 06:06 | 1.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:42 to 02:42 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:44 to 01:44 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:40 to 40:40 | 0.0% |
| White Alan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:12 | 00:00 | 04:39 +00:33 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 05:12 | 04:27 -00:12 | 04:39 +00:33 |
| Running 2 | 04:44 | 09:27 | 04:58 -00:14 | 09:06 +00:21 |
| Sled Push | 02:42 | 14:11 | 02:56 -00:14 | 14:04 +00:07 |
| Running 3 | 04:57 | 16:53 | 05:25 -00:28 | 17:00 -00:07 |
| Sled Pull | 04:43 | 21:50 | 05:00 -00:17 | 22:25 -00:35 |
| Running 4 | 05:02 | 26:33 | 05:24 -00:22 | 27:25 -00:52 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:46 | 31:35 | 05:20 +02:26 | 32:49 -01:14 |
| Running 5 | 05:06 | 39:21 | 05:34 -00:28 | 38:09 +01:12 |
| Rowing | 04:31 | 44:27 | 04:49 -00:18 | 43:43 +00:44 |
| Running 6 | 05:08 | 48:58 | 05:27 -00:19 | 48:32 +00:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:44 | 54:06 | 02:12 -00:28 | 53:59 +00:07 |
| Running 7 | 05:10 | 55:50 | 05:24 -00:14 | 56:11 -00:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:26 | 01:01:00 | 05:06 +00:20 | 01:01:35 -00:35 |
| Running 8 | 05:24 | 01:06:26 | 06:03 -00:39 | 01:06:41 -00:15 |
| Wall Balls | 06:09 | 01:11:50 | 06:33 -00:24 | 01:12:44 -00:54 |
| Roxzone | 08:22 | 01:26:13 | 06:56 +01:26 | 01:26:13 |
Alan White delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Perth Hyrox race, finishing with an overall rank of 250, placing him in the top 36% of 688 athletes. Within his age group (30-34), he ranked 71st, placing him in the top 45% of 156 competitors. His total running time was 00:40:40, which was 02:39 faster than average, indicating a strong running capability. The data suggests that Alan has a runner's profile, excelling in running segments while needing to focus more on his strength-based exercises. His running splits were consistently faster than average, except for the initial running segment, suggesting a conservative start. However, this approach allowed him to maintain and even improve his pace throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schmidt Christian | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:25:53 | |
| Thielsch Sebastiaan | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:26:18 | |
| Renner Manuel | 2023 Hannover | 01:26:42 | |
| Cederberg Gustaf | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:26:28 | |
| Perves Victor | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:26:09 | |
| Tippenhauer Martin | 2022 Hamburg | 01:25:50 | |
| Langemann Rudolf | 2022 Berlin | 01:26:06 | |
| Silvio Matt | 2020 Dallas | 01:26:43 | |
| Phillips Jordan | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:26:17 | |
| Alireza Sulaiman Abdullah A | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:26:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:30:58 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
