Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
560 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 560 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 560 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of Wells Amy's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Wells Amy hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 560 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Wells Amy’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Wells Amy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
03:02.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 560 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Amy Wells demonstrated an impressive performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race. As a top 27% finisher overall and within the top 26% in her age group, Amy showed a strong balance between running and strength-based activities. Her total running time was faster than average by 18 seconds, indicating a solid running profile.
Amy's pacing seemed to improve as the race progressed, with her best running lap timing of 6 minutes and 22 seconds recorded during 'Running 3'. However, she started slower than average on 'Running 1', indicating a potential need to work on early race pacing. Nevertheless, Amy's overall performance points towards a stronger runner profile.
Segments to Improve:
Roxzone: Amy's Roxzone time was 3 minutes and 24 seconds slower than average, indicating potential improvements in transition times and overall fitness. Amy could incorporate high-intensity interval training (HIIT) into her routine for better cardiovascular conditioning and faster recovery times. Practicing quick transitions between different exercises could also help decrease Roxzone time.
Sled Pull: Amy finished this segment 1 minute and 6 seconds slower than average, suggesting a need to enhance her pulling strength. Training with resistance bands and focusing on exercises such as seated cable rows, deadlifts, and bent-over rows could improve her performance in this area.
Wall Balls: With a time slower than average by 54 seconds, this segment could be improved by focusing on lower body strength and coordination. Squats, lunges, and plyometric exercises like jump squats could help improve performance.
Race Strategies:
For future races, Amy should consider starting off at a steadier pace, aiming to keep her initial running segments closer to the average pace. This could help conserve energy for the strength-based segments and the latter half of the race.
Amy could also benefit from focusing on her transitions. Efficient movement between exercise zones can significantly reduce Roxzone times and overall race time. Practicing transitions during training sessions, focusing on quick recovery and immediate engagement with the next exercise could prove beneficial.
Finally, Amy should continue to leverage her running strength by maintaining or slightly increasing her pace during the running segments. However, this should be balanced with the need to conserve energy for the strength-based segments, particularly those where she has room for improvement.