Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Thompson Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Thompson Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Thompson Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Thompson Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:41 | 05:45 to 04:04 | 40.9% |
| Run Total | 00:36 | 38:05 to 37:29 | 14.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:32 | 02:49 to 02:17 | 13.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:26 | 02:12 to 01:46 | 10.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:22 | 04:33 to 04:11 | 8.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:20 | 04:16 to 03:56 | 8.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:06 | 05:09 to 05:03 | 2.4% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:34 to 04:30 | 1.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:47 to 03:47 | 0.0% |
| Thompson Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:31 | 00:00 | 04:16 +01:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 05:31 | 04:18 +00:15 | 04:16 +01:15 |
| Running 2 | 04:38 | 10:04 | 04:33 +00:05 | 08:34 +01:30 |
| Sled Push | 02:49 | 14:42 | 02:37 +00:12 | 13:07 +01:35 |
| Running 3 | 04:44 | 17:31 | 04:54 -00:10 | 15:44 +01:47 |
| Sled Pull | 04:16 | 22:15 | 04:21 -00:05 | 20:38 +01:37 |
| Running 4 | 04:46 | 26:31 | 04:53 -00:07 | 24:59 +01:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:45 | 31:17 | 04:32 +01:13 | 29:52 +01:25 |
| Running 5 | 04:44 | 37:02 | 05:00 -00:16 | 34:24 +02:38 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 41:46 | 04:36 -00:02 | 39:24 +02:22 |
| Running 6 | 04:28 | 46:20 | 04:54 -00:26 | 44:00 +02:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:12 | 50:48 | 01:59 +00:13 | 48:54 +01:54 |
| Running 7 | 04:32 | 53:00 | 04:53 -00:21 | 50:53 +02:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:47 | 57:32 | 04:28 -00:41 | 55:46 +01:46 |
| Running 8 | 04:46 | 01:01:19 | 05:18 -00:32 | 01:00:14 +01:05 |
| Wall Balls | 05:09 | 01:06:05 | 05:39 -00:30 | 01:05:32 +00:33 |
| Roxzone | 05:52 | 01:16:57 | 05:46 +00:06 | 01:16:57 |
Mark Thompson showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. Being in the top 16% of all athletes and the top 18% in his age category, his overall rank and performance were excellent. His total running time was faster than average, indicating a strong running profile. Mark started slower in the first segments but progressively improved his pace and performed above average in later running segments. His best running lap was impressive at 00:04:28. However, the Roxzone time was slightly slower than average, indicating room for improvement in transitions and overall fitness.
Mark should consider the following strategies for better performance in future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bennett Dominic | 2022 Manchester | 01:16:34 | |
| Engler Luca | 2024 Rimini | 01:17:19 | |
| Caves Andrew | 2023 London | 01:17:09 | |
| Genrich Ole | 2024 Berlin | 01:17:12 | |
| Dino Andrew Stephen | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:16:54 | |
| Gregson Murray | 2024 Sydney | 01:16:46 | |
| Olsen Kasper | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:16:38 | |
| Waschkewitz Markus | 2023 Köln | 01:17:12 | |
| Janicki Michał | 2023 Warschau | 01:16:44 | |
| Zwittnigg Florian | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:17:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:17:48 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:36:37 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
