Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 35 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:19. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:44 (From 10:51 to 09:07) | 27.4% |
| BBJ | 01:41 (From 08:42 to 07:01) | 26.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:57 (From 04:34 to 03:37) | 15.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:50 (From 06:16 to 05:26) | 13.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:34 (From 09:31 to 08:57) | 9.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 (From 05:32 to 05:14) | 4.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:11 (From 07:02 to 06:51) | 2.9% |
| Rowing | 00:04 (From 05:39 to 05:35) | 1.1% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 46:18 to 46:18) | 0.0% |
| Telfer Micayla | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:23 | 00:00 | 05:40 +00:43 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:32 | 06:23 | 05:08 +00:24 | 05:40 +00:43 |
| Running 2 | 05:28 | 11:55 | 06:15 -00:47 | 10:48 +01:07 |
| Sled Push | 06:16 | 17:23 | 04:45 +01:31 | 17:03 +00:20 |
| Running 3 | 05:35 | 23:39 | 06:48 -01:13 | 21:48 +01:51 |
| Sled Pull | 10:51 | 29:14 | 09:01 +01:50 | 28:36 +00:38 |
| Running 4 | 05:42 | 40:05 | 06:49 -01:07 | 37:37 +02:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:42 | 45:47 | 07:48 +00:54 | 44:26 +01:21 |
| Running 5 | 05:50 | 54:29 | 06:59 -01:09 | 52:14 +02:15 |
| Rowing | 05:39 | 01:00:19 | 05:35 +00:04 | 59:13 +01:06 |
| Running 6 | 05:44 | 01:05:58 | 06:56 -01:12 | 01:04:48 +01:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 04:34 | 01:11:42 | 03:48 +00:46 | 01:11:44 -00:02 |
| Running 7 | 05:39 | 01:16:16 | 07:04 -01:25 | 01:15:32 +00:44 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:02 | 01:21:55 | 07:03 -00:01 | 01:22:36 -00:41 |
| Running 8 | 06:01 | 01:28:57 | 07:59 -01:58 | 01:29:39 -00:42 |
| Wall Balls | 09:31 | 01:34:58 | 09:14 +00:17 | 01:37:38 -02:40 |
| Roxzone | 11:14 | 01:55:34 | 08:42 +02:32 | 01:55:34 |
Micayla Telfer, a woman in her late 40s, delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX Pro race. She ranked within the top 30% of 524 athletes overall, revealing a competitive edge and a high level of fitness. Her overall time was 01:55:34, indicating a strong endurance capacity.
Micayla's Total Running Time was 00:46:18, which was 08:06 faster than the average running time. This suggests that she has an exceptional running profile and her speed is one of her primary strengths. However, during the first segment (Running 1), she started slower than average, which may have affected her overall timing. By the second running segment, she had picked up speed and maintained a faster than average pace throughout the remaining running segments.
Her performance in the roxzone, however, was slower than average, indicating that she may have taken more time to rest or transition between exercises. This highlights a potential area of improvement in terms of overall fitness and transition speed.
Micayla should pay attention to her pacing, especially at the beginning of the race. Although she was able to recover quickly after the first running segment, starting too slow could hinder her overall performance. A more consistent pace throughout the race can help conserve energy and prevent burnout towards the end.
Additionally, she should try to minimize rest time in the roxzone. Practicing quick transitions between exercises during training can help improve this. Also, focusing on recovery strategies such as proper nutrition and hydration during the race can help maintain energy levels and reduce the need for extended rest periods.
Lastly, considering her strength in running, Micayla could leverage this to gain time in the race. However, she should also aim to improve her performance in strength-based exercises to become a more well-rounded athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Glass Anne | 2024 Glasgow | 01:55:38 | |
| Barberan Léa | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:56:03 | |
| Ribera Carmen Luz | 2024 Brisbane | 01:55:33 | |
| Solomon Jennifer | 2023 Glasgow | 01:56:01 | |
| latorre Susann | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:55:54 | |
| Bains Jaskiranprit | 2024 Manchester | 01:55:11 | |
| Waters Samantha | 2023 Manchester | 01:56:03 | |
| HarveyCartmell Victoria | 2024 Glasgow | 01:55:19 | |
| Lning Nienke | 2023 Köln | 01:56:02 | |
| Fava Giulia | 2024 Milan | 01:55:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester Telfer Micayla | 02:04:56 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Telfer Micayla
