Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Pavlou Phillip's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Pavlou Phillip's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Pavlou Phillip's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Pavlou Phillip's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:10 | 42:08 to 39:58 | 41.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:11 | 05:42 to 04:31 | 22.6% |
| Sled Pull | 01:04 | 05:25 to 04:21 | 20.4% |
| Rowing | 00:28 | 05:06 to 04:38 | 8.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:21 | 02:17 to 01:56 | 6.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:08 to 02:08 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:47 to 03:47 | 0.0% |
| Pavlou Phillip | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:13 | 00:00 | 04:30 -00:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:09 | 04:13 | 04:23 -00:14 | 04:30 -00:17 |
| Running 2 | 04:13 | 08:22 | 04:47 -00:34 | 08:53 -00:31 |
| Sled Push | 02:08 | 12:35 | 02:46 -00:38 | 13:40 -01:05 |
| Running 3 | 04:34 | 14:43 | 05:12 -00:38 | 16:26 -01:43 |
| Sled Pull | 05:25 | 19:17 | 04:40 +00:45 | 21:38 -02:21 |
| Running 4 | 04:50 | 24:42 | 05:09 -00:19 | 26:18 -01:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:26 | 29:32 | 04:58 -00:32 | 31:27 -01:55 |
| Running 5 | 06:00 | 33:58 | 05:19 +00:41 | 36:25 -02:27 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 39:58 | 04:44 +00:22 | 41:44 -01:46 |
| Running 6 | 07:48 | 45:04 | 05:12 +02:36 | 46:28 -01:24 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:17 | 52:52 | 02:06 +00:11 | 51:40 +01:12 |
| Running 7 | 05:17 | 55:09 | 05:10 +00:07 | 53:46 +01:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:42 | 01:00:26 | 04:51 +00:51 | 58:56 +01:30 |
| Running 8 | 05:17 | 01:06:08 | 05:42 -00:25 | 01:03:47 +02:21 |
| Wall Balls | 03:47 | 01:11:25 | 06:08 -02:21 | 01:09:29 +01:56 |
| Roxzone | 06:53 | 01:21:56 | 06:19 +00:34 | 01:21:56 |
Phillip Pavlou, competing in the HYROX Melbourne 2024 event, demonstrated commendable performance by finishing in the top 22% of all athletes and the top 25% in his age group. His overall time was 01:21:56. A detailed analysis of his splits reveals a strong start, particularly in the early running segments and strength-based exercises like the sled push. However, his total running time was 43 seconds slower than the average, indicating a need for improvement in endurance and running efficiency. The data suggests Phillip has a hybrid profile, with strengths in both running and strength exercises, but he needs to improve his endurance as his pace seems to slow in the latter half of the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Watkins Ben | 2024 Manchester | 01:21:50 | |
| Raab Thomas | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:22:26 | |
| Hager Mathias | 2024 Stockholm | 01:21:39 | |
| Lorenzini Samuele | 2023 Milan | 01:22:07 | |
| Malenfant Benjamin | 2023 Paris | 01:22:14 | |
| Van Son Joris | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:22:19 | |
| Wäsler Dominik | 2023 München | 01:22:13 | |
| Murgatroyd Olly | 2022 Birmingham | 01:21:57 | |
| Akkerman Maurits | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:22:02 | |
| King Matthew | 2023 London | 01:22:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
