Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Odonnell Karl's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Odonnell Karl's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Odonnell Karl's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Odonnell Karl's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:53 | 40:09 to 37:16 | 73.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:34 | 02:49 to 02:15 | 14.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:13 | 04:07 to 03:54 | 5.5% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 04:41 to 04:29 | 5.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 01:49 to 01:45 | 1.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:39 to 03:39 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Odonnell Karl | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:22 | 00:00 | 04:14 +00:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:04 | 04:22 | 04:18 -00:14 | 04:14 +00:08 |
| Running 2 | 04:41 | 08:26 | 04:33 +00:08 | 08:32 -00:06 |
| Sled Push | 02:49 | 13:07 | 02:37 +00:12 | 13:05 +00:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:10 | 15:56 | 04:54 +00:16 | 15:42 +00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 04:07 | 21:06 | 04:21 -00:14 | 20:36 +00:30 |
| Running 4 | 05:00 | 25:13 | 04:53 +00:07 | 24:57 +00:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:39 | 30:13 | 04:32 -00:53 | 29:50 +00:23 |
| Running 5 | 05:07 | 33:52 | 04:59 +00:08 | 34:22 -00:30 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 38:59 | 04:36 +00:05 | 39:21 -00:22 |
| Running 6 | 04:58 | 43:40 | 04:54 +00:04 | 43:57 -00:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:49 | 48:38 | 01:58 -00:09 | 48:51 -00:13 |
| Running 7 | 04:58 | 50:27 | 04:52 +00:06 | 50:49 -00:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:04 | 55:25 | 04:27 -00:23 | 55:41 -00:16 |
| Running 8 | 05:57 | 59:29 | 05:17 +00:40 | 01:00:08 -00:39 |
| Wall Balls | 04:47 | 01:05:26 | 05:38 -00:51 | 01:05:25 +00:01 |
| Roxzone | 06:40 | 01:16:44 | 05:41 +00:59 | 01:16:44 |
His overall time of 01:16:44 was respectable, but there are areas of improvement that can be addressed to enhance his performance in future races.
Karl's total running time of 00:40:09 was 02:41 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he could benefit from improving his overall fitness and reducing his transition time between exercises.
It is worth noting that Karl's best running lap was 00:04:22, which was 00:17 slower than the average. This suggests that he may need to work on his pacing during the race.
To improve his performance in these segments, Karl should focus on the following training strategies and techniques:
1. Run Total: Karl lost time in the overall running portion of the race. To improve this segment, he should incorporate more running-specific training into his routine. This can include interval training, hill sprints, and long-distance runs to build endurance and speed.
2. Roxzone: Karl's roxzone time was 00:06:40, which was 01:10 slower than the average. To improve this segment, Karl should work on improving his overall fitness and reducing his transition time between exercises. High-intensity interval training (HIIT), circuit training, and plyometric exercises can help improve his cardiovascular fitness and agility.
3. Running 8: Karl's running time in segment 8 was 00:05:57, which was 00:32 slower than the average. To improve this segment, Karl should focus on building his running endurance and speed. Incorporating tempo runs, fartlek training, and interval training can help improve his running performance.
4. Best Lap: Karl's best lap time was 00:04:22, which was 00:17 slower than the average. To improve this segment, Karl should work on pacing himself more effectively during the race. Practicing race-specific pace runs and learning to gauge his effort level can help him maintain a consistent and efficient pace throughout the race.
5. Running 1 and Running 3: Karl lost time in these running segments compared to the average. To improve his performance in these segments, Karl should focus on improving his running endurance and speed. Incorporating interval training, hill repeats, and strength training exercises that target the muscles used in running can help enhance his performance.
In conclusion, Karl Odonnell had a solid performance in the HYROX race in London. While there are areas for improvement, such as overall running time and transition time, he showcased his strengths in segments like Sled Push and Burpees Broad Jump. By incorporating targeted training strategies and techniques, Karl can enhance his performance in future races and continue to improve his overall fitness and endurance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Annovati Alberico | 2023 Milan | 01:16:25 | |
| Clarkson Matthew | 2023 London | 01:16:59 | |
| Taylor Ethan | 2024 London | 01:16:24 | |
| Greve Patrick | 2023 Köln | 01:17:11 | |
| Agnew James | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:16:21 | |
| Christensen Casper | 2024 Malaga | 01:16:14 | |
| Lichtenfeldt Robert | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:16:29 | |
| Stratmann Jan | 2022 Essen | 01:16:28 | |
| Snape Steve | 2024 Glasgow | 01:16:26 | |
| Tappin Gary | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:16:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Manchester | 01:21:39 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
