Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Neill Rob's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Neill Rob's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Neill Rob's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Neill Rob's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:49 | 44:29 to 42:40 | 45.2% |
| Wall Balls | 01:37 | 07:56 to 06:19 | 40.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:25 | 05:14 to 04:49 | 10.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:32 to 04:26 | 2.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 | 02:53 to 02:49 | 1.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:12 to 05:12 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:59 to 01:59 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Neill Rob | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:27 | 00:00 | 04:40 +00:47 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 05:27 | 04:29 +00:03 | 04:40 +00:47 |
| Running 2 | 04:54 | 09:59 | 05:05 -00:11 | 09:09 +00:50 |
| Sled Push | 02:53 | 14:53 | 02:59 -00:06 | 14:14 +00:39 |
| Running 3 | 05:15 | 17:46 | 05:33 -00:18 | 17:13 +00:33 |
| Sled Pull | 05:14 | 23:01 | 05:05 +00:09 | 22:46 +00:15 |
| Running 4 | 05:17 | 28:15 | 05:31 -00:14 | 27:51 +00:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:12 | 33:32 | 05:33 -00:21 | 33:22 +00:10 |
| Running 5 | 05:58 | 38:44 | 05:42 +00:16 | 38:55 -00:11 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 44:42 | 04:52 -00:11 | 44:37 +00:05 |
| Running 6 | 05:25 | 49:23 | 05:33 -00:08 | 49:29 -00:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 54:48 | 02:14 -00:15 | 55:02 -00:14 |
| Running 7 | 05:12 | 56:47 | 05:32 -00:20 | 57:16 -00:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:42 | 01:01:59 | 05:18 -00:36 | 01:02:48 -00:49 |
| Running 8 | 07:06 | 01:06:41 | 06:11 +00:55 | 01:08:06 -01:25 |
| Wall Balls | 07:56 | 01:13:47 | 06:45 +01:11 | 01:14:17 -00:30 |
| Roxzone | 06:32 | 01:28:05 | 07:03 -00:31 | 01:28:05 |
Based on the splits analysis, Rob's pacing seemed to be consistent throughout the race, with some segments being faster or slower than average. It is worth noting that his total running time of 00:44:29 was 02:22 slower than the average time, indicating that he could benefit from improving his running fitness and speed. However, his best running lap time of 00:04:54 suggests that he has the potential to perform well in running segments.
In summary, Rob Neill had a commendable performance in the 2022 Birmingham Hyrox race. To improve his overall performance, he should focus on improving his running fitness and speed, particularly in segments where he experienced the most time losses. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training and strength exercises, Rob can enhance his performance in these areas. Additionally, implementing effective race strategies, such as pacing, transition efficiency, and mental preparation, can contribute to better overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Polanco De La Rosa José Joaquín | 2024 Malaga | 01:27:38 | |
| Zarfoss Benjamin | 2024 Dallas | 01:28:07 | |
| Burrows Barry | 2022 Birmingham | 01:28:19 | |
| Kritzinger Daniel | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:28:33 | |
| Passingham James | 2023 London | 01:28:10 | |
| Mitra Gabriel | 2024 Singapore | 01:27:54 | |
| Marquez Mario | 2018 Hamburg | 01:28:30 | |
| Brenzel Brian | 2023 Dallas | 01:28:30 | |
| Richards James | 2024 Melbourne | 01:28:29 | |
| Keuthen Oliver | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:28:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 London | 01:24:31 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
