Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Mullen Abigail's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mullen Abigail's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mullen Abigail's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mullen Abigail's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
04:43.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Abigail Mullen demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. She placed in the top 20% of all athletes and the top 23% in her age group (25-29). A notable strength in her performance was the total running time. She was faster than the average by 3 minutes and 35 seconds, suggesting that she has a strong runner's profile.
However, her pacing in the early stages of the race seemed to be slower than average, particularly in the first running segment, where she was slower by 1 minute and 3 seconds. This indicates she might have started the race at a slower pace. Nonetheless, she showed significant improvement in subsequent running segments, consistently beating the average times.
Segments to Improve
Some areas of improvement were identified in the Wall Balls, Burpees Broad Jump, and Roxzone segments. These exercises test both strength and endurance, and it appears Abigail struggled with them relative to her peers.
Wall Balls: Abigail was slower than average by 1 minute and 7 seconds. To improve, she could incorporate more functional strength training into her routine. Squats and thrusters are good exercises to build lower body and core strength, which are crucial for this activity. Practicing the actual movement with lighter weights can also help improve her form and efficiency.
Burpees Broad Jump: She was slower than average by 1 minute and 2 seconds in this segment. Abigail could work on plyometric exercises to improve power and explosiveness, such as box jumps and kettlebell swings. Additionally, practicing the burpee broad jump movement can help her become more efficient and faster in this segment.
Roxzone: Abigail was slower than average by 30 seconds. This could be due to needing more recovery time between exercises or slower transition times. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) can help improve her fitness level and recovery time. To improve transition times, she could practice transitioning between different exercises to become more efficient.
Race Strategies
Considering Abigail's strengths and weaknesses, a few race strategies could be implemented for better performance. Firstly, as she has a strong runner's profile, she could leverage this strength by pushing her pace in the running segments, while conserving energy for strength-based exercises.
Secondly, she should focus on maintaining a steady pace from the start of the race. Starting too slow can cause her to lose valuable time, which can be challenging to make up in later stages.
Lastly, focusing on efficient transitions between exercises can also help save time and energy. This involves not only physical preparation, but also mental preparation, knowing what exercise is coming up next and being ready to switch gears quickly.