Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcnamara Dean's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcnamara Dean's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcnamara Dean's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcnamara Dean's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:14 | 45:54 to 42:40 | 70.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:41 | 05:42 to 05:01 | 14.9% |
| Rowing | 00:23 | 05:10 to 04:47 | 8.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:18 | 02:25 to 02:07 | 6.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:57 to 05:57 | 0.0% |
| Mcnamara Dean | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:44 | 00:00 | 04:41 +00:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 04:44 | 04:29 -00:11 | 04:41 +00:03 |
| Running 2 | 04:51 | 09:02 | 05:03 -00:12 | 09:10 -00:08 |
| Sled Push | 01:54 | 13:53 | 02:59 -01:05 | 14:13 -00:20 |
| Running 3 | 05:12 | 15:47 | 05:31 -00:19 | 17:12 -01:25 |
| Sled Pull | 04:28 | 20:59 | 05:05 -00:37 | 22:43 -01:44 |
| Running 4 | 05:16 | 25:27 | 05:29 -00:13 | 27:48 -02:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:04 | 30:43 | 05:32 -00:28 | 33:17 -02:34 |
| Running 5 | 06:27 | 35:47 | 05:41 +00:46 | 38:49 -03:02 |
| Rowing | 05:10 | 42:14 | 04:52 +00:18 | 44:30 -02:16 |
| Running 6 | 07:02 | 47:24 | 05:31 +01:31 | 49:22 -01:58 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:25 | 54:26 | 02:13 +00:12 | 54:53 -00:27 |
| Running 7 | 06:05 | 56:51 | 05:30 +00:35 | 57:06 -00:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:42 | 01:02:56 | 05:16 +00:26 | 01:02:36 +00:20 |
| Running 8 | 06:20 | 01:08:38 | 06:09 +00:11 | 01:07:52 +00:46 |
| Wall Balls | 05:57 | 01:14:58 | 06:45 -00:48 | 01:14:01 +00:57 |
| Roxzone | 07:03 | 01:27:51 | 07:05 -00:02 | 01:27:51 |
Dean Mcnamara delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, ranking in the top 34% overall and top 36% in his age group. His overall time was 01:27:51. Dean showcased notable strength in exercises such as the Sled Push and Sled Pull, indicating a strong aptitude for strength-based activities. However, his total running time was 00:45:54, which was 01:56 slower than the average, suggesting that there is room for improvement in running efficiency. His initial running segments were relatively strong, but his pace significantly dropped in the latter half of the race, indicating a potential issue with endurance or pacing strategy. Dean appears to be a hybrid athlete, with strengths in both running and strength exercises, but with a slight leaning towards strength activities.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Klingseis Johannes | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:27:23 | |
| Wanford Paul | 2023 Birmingham | 01:27:28 | |
| Wornham Jamie | 2024 Glasgow | 01:27:51 | |
| Grah Lovro | 2019 Wien | 01:27:35 | |
| Froehling Robert | 2024 Dallas | 01:27:57 | |
| Lander Matthew | 2024 Malaga | 01:27:24 | |
| Weiss Fabian | 2023 München | 01:27:28 | |
| Mackrael Matthew | 2022 Birmingham | 01:28:13 | |
| Franz Mahnke Sportclub Wolgast E | 2019 Hamburg | 01:27:23 | |
| Colon Frankie | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:27:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
