Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Houston using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lehmann Peter's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lehmann Peter's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lehmann Peter's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lehmann Peter's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:38 | 44:37 to 41:59 | 47.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:54 | 06:48 to 04:54 | 34.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:35 | 05:40 to 05:05 | 10.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:22 | 03:07 to 02:45 | 6.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:03 | 04:45 to 04:42 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:00 to 04:00 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:41 to 01:41 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:23 to 05:23 | 0.0% |
| Lehmann Peter | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:32 | 00:00 | 04:40 -01:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:00 | 03:32 | 04:27 -00:27 | 04:40 -01:08 |
| Running 2 | 04:59 | 07:32 | 05:00 -00:01 | 09:07 -01:35 |
| Sled Push | 03:07 | 12:31 | 02:56 +00:11 | 14:07 -01:36 |
| Running 3 | 05:50 | 15:38 | 05:26 +00:24 | 17:03 -01:25 |
| Sled Pull | 04:45 | 21:28 | 05:00 -00:15 | 22:29 -01:01 |
| Running 4 | 05:54 | 26:13 | 05:25 +00:29 | 27:29 -01:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:40 | 32:07 | 05:22 +00:18 | 32:54 -00:47 |
| Running 5 | 06:10 | 37:47 | 05:35 +00:35 | 38:16 -00:29 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 43:57 | 04:50 -00:10 | 43:51 +00:06 |
| Running 6 | 05:41 | 48:37 | 05:28 +00:13 | 48:41 -00:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:41 | 54:18 | 02:12 -00:31 | 54:09 +00:09 |
| Running 7 | 05:48 | 55:59 | 05:26 +00:22 | 56:21 -00:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:48 | 01:01:47 | 05:08 +01:40 | 01:01:47 +00:00 |
| Running 8 | 06:47 | 01:08:35 | 06:04 +00:43 | 01:06:55 +01:40 |
| Wall Balls | 05:23 | 01:15:22 | 06:34 -01:11 | 01:12:59 +02:23 |
| Roxzone | 05:55 | 01:26:31 | 06:58 -01:03 | 01:26:31 |
With a best running lap time of 00:03:32, Peter demonstrated his speed and agility on the course. His pacing throughout the race was consistent, as he was faster than the average in both the Running 1 and Ski Erg segments. However, he struggled in segments such as Sandbag Lunges, Burpees Broad Jump, and Running 8, where he lost significant time compared to the average.
In conclusion, Peter Lehmann showed strong performance in the HYROX race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his overall performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as increasing leg strength for Sandbag Lunges, improving explosiveness for Burpees Broad Jump, and enhancing running endurance for Running 8, Peter can continue to excel in future races. Implementing efficient race strategies and maintaining a consistent pace will also contribute to his overall performance improvement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Khudiakov Valerii | 2023 Warschau | 01:26:50 | |
| Waschk Simon Rumi | 2023 Hamburg | 01:26:59 | |
| Wong Tsun Kiu | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:26:09 | |
| Frost Harrison | 2022 Chicago | 01:26:01 | |
| Petrovic Alexander | 2021 Berlin | 01:26:04 | |
| Franquinet Bob | 2024 Maastricht | 01:26:26 | |
| Maxwell Darren | 2024 Glasgow | 01:26:04 | |
| Freiter Jens | 2024 Hamburg | 01:26:05 | |
| Gelles David | 2024 New York | 01:26:18 | |
| Ronan Brian | 2024 Dublin | 01:26:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 New York | 01:31:35 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
