Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2020 Chicago using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Iannone Timothy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Iannone Timothy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Iannone Timothy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Iannone Timothy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:58. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:36 | 07:16 to 04:40 | 43.6% |
| Sled Push | 01:19 | 04:02 to 02:43 | 22.1% |
| Run Total | 00:56 | 42:45 to 41:49 | 15.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:41 | 05:04 to 04:23 | 11.5% |
| Rowing | 00:20 | 05:04 to 04:44 | 5.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 02:09 to 02:03 | 1.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:24 to 03:24 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:52 to 03:52 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:55 to 05:55 | 0.0% |
| Iannone Timothy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:42 | 00:00 | 04:38 +00:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:04 | 04:42 | 04:27 +00:37 | 04:38 +00:04 |
| Running 2 | 04:48 | 09:46 | 04:59 -00:11 | 09:05 +00:41 |
| Sled Push | 04:02 | 14:34 | 02:55 +01:07 | 14:04 +00:30 |
| Running 3 | 05:41 | 18:36 | 05:25 +00:16 | 16:59 +01:37 |
| Sled Pull | 07:16 | 24:17 | 04:59 +02:17 | 22:24 +01:53 |
| Running 4 | 05:28 | 31:33 | 05:24 +00:04 | 27:23 +04:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:24 | 37:01 | 05:20 -01:56 | 32:47 +04:14 |
| Running 5 | 05:29 | 40:25 | 05:34 -00:05 | 38:07 +02:18 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 45:54 | 04:49 +00:15 | 43:41 +02:13 |
| Running 6 | 05:26 | 50:58 | 05:26 +00:00 | 48:30 +02:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 56:24 | 02:11 -00:02 | 53:56 +02:28 |
| Running 7 | 05:33 | 58:33 | 05:24 +00:09 | 56:07 +02:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:52 | 01:04:06 | 05:06 -01:14 | 01:01:31 +02:35 |
| Running 8 | 05:40 | 01:07:58 | 06:02 -00:22 | 01:06:37 +01:21 |
| Wall Balls | 05:55 | 01:13:38 | 06:33 -00:38 | 01:12:39 +00:59 |
| Roxzone | 06:44 | 01:26:08 | 06:56 -00:12 | 01:26:08 |
Timothy's total running time of 00:42:45 was 01:16 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time in order to perform better in the roxzone. Additionally, his best running lap was 00:04:42, which was 00:14 slower than the average.
In summary, Timothy Iannone performed well in the 2020 Chicago Hyrox race, but there are areas for improvement. Focusing on strength and power in segments such as the sled pull and sled push, as well as improving running performance, will enhance his overall race performance. Incorporating specific exercises, drills, and training routines tailored to these areas will help Timothy reach his full potential in future races. Additionally, implementing race strategies such as pacing, efficient transitions, and mental preparation will contribute to improved performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Miranda Dilan | 2023 München | 01:26:05 | |
| Mcghee Ben | 2023 London | 01:25:38 | |
| Blair Nick | 2023 Dubai | 01:26:34 | |
| Salvador Aviles Antonio | 2020 Dallas | 01:25:56 | |
| Tebb Matthew | 2023 London | 01:26:14 | |
| Jorge Sandro | 2024 Marseille | 01:25:51 | |
| Treml Felix | 2018 Hamburg | 01:26:33 | |
| Hunt Richard | 2024 London | 01:25:49 | |
| Bazire Damien | 2023 Paris | 01:26:12 | |
| Burchell Phill | 2024 Stockholm | 01:26:10 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
