Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 992 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:07 (From 51:30 to 49:23) | 51.8% |
| Wall Balls | 01:17 (From 06:51 to 05:34) | 31.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:41 (From 05:59 to 05:18) | 16.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 05:01 to 05:01) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:25 to 02:25) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 05:14 to 05:14) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 06:33 to 06:33) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 05:00 to 05:00) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:08 to 02:08) | 0.0% |
| Hesslewood Gemma | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:04 | 00:00 | 05:31 +00:33 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:01 | 06:04 | 05:17 -00:16 | 05:31 +00:33 |
| Running 2 | 06:07 | 11:05 | 05:55 +00:12 | 10:48 +00:17 |
| Sled Push | 02:25 | 17:12 | 03:00 -00:35 | 16:43 +00:29 |
| Running 3 | 06:12 | 19:37 | 06:17 -00:05 | 19:43 -00:06 |
| Sled Pull | 05:14 | 25:49 | 06:27 -01:13 | 26:00 -00:11 |
| Running 4 | 06:16 | 31:03 | 06:19 -00:03 | 32:27 -01:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:33 | 37:19 | 07:10 -00:37 | 38:46 -01:27 |
| Running 5 | 06:58 | 43:52 | 06:32 +00:26 | 45:56 -02:04 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 50:50 | 05:37 -00:37 | 52:28 -01:38 |
| Running 6 | 06:31 | 55:50 | 06:24 +00:07 | 58:05 -02:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 01:02:21 | 02:27 -00:19 | 01:04:29 -02:08 |
| Running 7 | 06:22 | 01:04:29 | 06:21 +00:01 | 01:06:56 -02:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:59 | 01:10:51 | 05:25 +00:34 | 01:13:17 -02:26 |
| Running 8 | 07:04 | 01:16:50 | 07:05 -00:01 | 01:18:42 -01:52 |
| Wall Balls | 06:51 | 01:23:54 | 05:40 +01:11 | 01:25:47 -01:53 |
| Roxzone | 08:52 | 01:39:29 | 08:02 +00:50 | 01:39:29 |
Gemma Hesslewood demonstrated an impressive performance at the 2024 Birmingham HYROX competition, finishing within the top 21% of her age category. While she excelled in numerous areas, there are a few segments where improvement is needed.
When considering her profile as a fitness athlete, Gemma's strength stands out more than her running. Her total running time is slower than average, indicating a need for enhanced focus on this aspect of her training. However, it's important to note that her pacing appeared consistent throughout the race, as she didn't start too fast or too slow compared to the average.
Moving forward, Gemma should consider implementing these strategies during her races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Velardi Alexandra | 2024 Melbourne | 01:39:44 | |
| Banach Jolanta | 2024 Melbourne | 01:39:41 | |
| Di Maio Elita | 2024 Turin | 01:39:16 | |
| Janssen Charlotte | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:39:47 | |
| Boucher Mercedes | 2022 Dallas | 01:39:36 | |
| Aarssen Kelly | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:39:47 | |
| Ocampo Mary | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:39:05 | |
| Crosley Krisha | 2024 Dallas | 01:39:47 | |
| Gal Zsuzsi | 2024 Melbourne | 01:39:01 | |
| Mevelec Jennifer | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:39:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London Hesslewood Gemma | 01:36:28 | |
| 2024 London Hesslewood Gemma | 01:37:34 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Hesslewood Gemma
