Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
21 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Pro Men
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 21 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Pro Men
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 21 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Pro Men
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of Herbert Kevin's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Herbert Kevin hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 21 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Pro Men
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Herbert Kevin’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Pro Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Herbert Kevin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
16:29.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 21 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Pro Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Kevin Herbert, participating in the 45-49 Age Group in the HYROX PRO category, gave a commendable performance. His overall rank of 335 places him in the top 63% of 524 athletes, and his rank in his age group is 28, which is in the top 54% of 51 athletes. His total running time was 00:50:13, which is 05:55 faster than the average running time. This suggests that Kevin is a strong runner and excels in this aspect of the race.
However, Kevin's performance in the first running segment was 03:31 slower than average which indicates that he may have started the race slower than necessary. Kevin's strength lies in his running ability, as is evident from his faster than average total running time.
Segments to Improve:
Sled Pull: This was Kevin's weakest segment, as he was 06:35 slower than the average. To improve in this area, Kevin should incorporate more sled pull exercises into his training routine. Focusing on technique, such as keeping the chest low and driving with the legs, can help improve efficiency and speed in this segment.
Wall Balls: Kevin was 02:15 slower than the average in this segment. To improve, he should include more wall ball exercises in his training, focusing on the technique of squatting low and exploding up. Strengthening the lower body and core muscles will also help improve performance in this segment.
Sandbag Lunges: Kevin was 01:02 slower than the average in this segment. Incorporating lunges with weights into his training routine can help improve his time. Focusing on form, such as keeping the upper body straight and the shoulders back, can also make a significant improvement.
Ski Erg: Kevin was 00:16 slower than average in this segment. To improve, he could incorporate more skiing exercises in his training routine, focusing on technique, such as using the core and hips more than the arms for pulling.
Race Strategies:
Given Kevin's strengths and areas for improvement, it would be beneficial for him to pace himself better in the initial stages of the race. He should exploit his strong running ability by maintaining a fast, but sustainable, pace throughout the race.
For the strength-based segments, Kevin should focus on maintaining good technique throughout, even when fatigued. This will help him to perform these exercises more efficiently and improve his overall timings.
Finally, Kevin should work on minimizing his transition times between exercises. This can be achieved by practicing quick transitions during training sessions and improving his overall fitness level.