Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 677 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Griffiths Sarah's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Griffiths Sarah's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Griffiths Sarah's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Griffiths Sarah's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:59 | 08:11 to 06:12 | 61.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:47 | 06:33 to 05:46 | 24.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:28 | 08:06 to 07:38 | 14.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:37 to 02:37 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:25 to 06:25 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:01 to 02:01 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 51:01 to 51:01 | 0.0% |
| Griffiths Sarah | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:08 | 00:00 | 05:41 +01:27 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:43 | 07:08 | 05:24 -00:41 | 05:41 +01:27 |
| Running 2 | 05:55 | 11:51 | 06:16 -00:21 | 11:05 +00:46 |
| Sled Push | 02:37 | 17:46 | 03:10 -00:33 | 17:21 +00:25 |
| Running 3 | 06:16 | 20:23 | 06:39 -00:23 | 20:31 -00:08 |
| Sled Pull | 06:25 | 26:39 | 06:52 -00:27 | 27:10 -00:31 |
| Running 4 | 06:19 | 33:04 | 06:40 -00:21 | 34:02 -00:58 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:06 | 39:23 | 07:53 +00:13 | 40:42 -01:19 |
| Running 5 | 06:17 | 47:29 | 06:52 -00:35 | 48:35 -01:06 |
| Rowing | 05:15 | 53:46 | 05:47 -00:32 | 55:27 -01:41 |
| Running 6 | 06:19 | 59:01 | 06:45 -00:26 | 01:01:14 -02:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 01:05:20 | 02:34 -00:33 | 01:07:59 -02:39 |
| Running 7 | 06:09 | 01:07:21 | 06:45 -00:36 | 01:10:33 -03:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:33 | 01:13:30 | 05:51 +00:42 | 01:17:18 -03:48 |
| Running 8 | 06:42 | 01:20:03 | 07:28 -00:46 | 01:23:09 -03:06 |
| Wall Balls | 08:11 | 01:26:45 | 06:22 +01:49 | 01:30:37 -03:52 |
| Roxzone | 11:00 | 01:45:47 | 08:48 +02:12 | 01:45:47 |
Sarah Griffiths demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event, finishing in the top 25% of all competitors and top 17% in her age group. Her overall strength and running capabilities proved advantageous, as evidenced by her total running time being faster than average. This suggests that she possesses a predominantly runner profile. However, she may have started off a bit slower than the average, as seen in her first running segment. Despite that, she quickly made up for it in the subsequent segments, suggesting effective pacing and energy conservation.
Moving forward, Sarah could take the following strategies into consideration for her future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Santos Mirele | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:45:26 | |
| Van Essen Marlou | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:46:01 | |
| A Piechocki Laura | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:46:04 | |
| Vijfschagt Manon | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:46:14 | |
| See Alexis | 2023 Singapore | 01:45:18 | |
| Doria Manuela | 2024 Rimini | 01:45:32 | |
| Eichner Andrea | 2022 Leipzig | 01:45:45 | |
| Mcgowan Laura | 2024 Manchester | 01:45:17 | |
| Peh Zi Qi | 2024 Singapore | 01:45:45 | |
| Constant Thibaut Amélie | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:45:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Birmingham | 02:14:24 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
