Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gerdingh Martijn's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gerdingh Martijn's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gerdingh Martijn's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gerdingh Martijn's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:59 | 52:28 to 47:29 | 52.2% |
| Sled Pull | 04:34 | 10:15 to 05:41 | 47.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:13 to 02:13 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:02 to 06:02 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:11 to 02:11 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Gerdingh Martijn | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:54 | 00:00 | 05:02 -01:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 03:54 | 04:39 -00:15 | 05:02 -01:08 |
| Running 2 | 06:04 | 08:18 | 05:34 +00:30 | 09:41 -01:23 |
| Sled Push | 02:13 | 14:22 | 03:24 -01:11 | 15:15 -00:53 |
| Running 3 | 07:12 | 16:35 | 06:06 +01:06 | 18:39 -02:04 |
| Sled Pull | 10:15 | 23:47 | 05:50 +04:25 | 24:45 -00:58 |
| Running 4 | 07:03 | 34:02 | 06:04 +00:59 | 30:35 +03:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:02 | 41:05 | 06:37 -00:35 | 36:39 +04:26 |
| Running 5 | 07:12 | 47:07 | 06:20 +00:52 | 43:16 +03:51 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 54:19 | 05:06 -00:23 | 49:36 +04:43 |
| Running 6 | 06:56 | 59:02 | 06:08 +00:48 | 54:42 +04:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:11 | 01:05:58 | 02:31 -00:20 | 01:00:50 +05:08 |
| Running 7 | 06:53 | 01:08:09 | 06:07 +00:46 | 01:03:21 +04:48 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:10 | 01:15:02 | 06:13 -02:03 | 01:09:28 +05:34 |
| Running 8 | 07:17 | 01:19:12 | 07:07 +00:10 | 01:15:41 +03:31 |
| Wall Balls | 04:51 | 01:26:29 | 07:53 -03:02 | 01:22:48 +03:41 |
| Roxzone | 08:00 | 01:39:12 | 08:31 -00:31 | 01:39:12 |
Pacing: Martijn's pacing throughout the race was generally consistent, with some segments performed faster than average and others slower. This indicates that he has a well-rounded fitness level but could benefit from focusing on specific areas of improvement.
Profile: Based on the analysis of his splits, Martijn has a more hybrid profile, meaning he excels in both running and strength exercises. However, he could work on improving his running performance to become more competitive in future races.
In conclusion, Martijn Gerdingh performed well in the Hyrox race in Rotterdam. While he demonstrated strengths in both running and strength exercises, there are areas where he can improve to enhance his overall performance. By implementing specific training strategies and techniques, focusing on his running performance, and optimizing his race strategies, Martijn can continue to progress and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hunt Ryan | 2022 London | 01:38:57 | |
| Carvalho David | 2022 New York | 01:39:03 | |
| Pesant Andy | 2021 Austin | 01:39:34 | |
| Ramirez Macias Israel | 2024 Mexico City | 01:38:54 | |
| Sham Timothy | 2024 Dallas | 01:38:47 | |
| Adentan Stephen | 2023 London | 01:39:27 | |
| Maher Sam | 2024 Poznan | 01:39:29 | |
| Opie Sam | 2024 London | 01:39:25 | |
| Toonen Andy | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:39:41 | |
| Lenzo Alex | 2024 Milan | 01:38:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:27:08 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
