Farr David Hyrox Result

Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 727 similar athletes.

Performance Highlights

GBR GBR Flag Men 60-64 #95035 01:51:15 11th in AG | Top 84.6% 1127th | Top 93.6%
+05:24
59:38
Run Total
+00:43
07:27
Avg. Lap
+00:56
06:28
Best Lap
-05:14
41:45
Workout Total
-00:39
05:13
Avg. Workout
-00:22
09:55
Roxzone

Race Summary

This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men

Running

We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.

Based on 727 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men

Workouts

We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.

Based on 727 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men

Pacing Quality

This section showcases the entire Farr David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average. It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Farr David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.

Based on 727 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men

Spread of Splits Time

This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Farr David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement. This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.

Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men

Improvement Plan

Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Farr David's time.

The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.

A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.

For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.

07:35 Potential Improvement 100.0% Focus During Training
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Splits Potential Improvement Time Focus During Training
Run Total 07:35 59:38 to 52:03 100.0%
Ski Erg 00:00 04:42 to 04:42 0.0%
Sled Push 00:00 03:13 to 03:13 0.0%
Sled Pull 00:00 05:58 to 05:58 0.0%
Burpees Broad Jump 00:00 07:11 to 07:11 0.0%
Rowing 00:00 05:15 to 05:15 0.0%
Farmers Carry 00:00 02:28 to 02:28 0.0%
Sandbag Lunges 00:00 06:17 to 06:17 0.0%
Wall Balls 00:00 06:41 to 06:41 0.0%

Splits Time

Farr David Perfect Race
Splits Total Average Total
Running 1 04:05 00:00 05:24 -01:19 00:00 +00:00
Ski Erg 04:42 04:05 04:48 -00:06 05:24 -01:19
Running 2 06:28 08:47 06:02 +00:26 10:12 -01:25
Sled Push 03:13 15:15 03:41 -00:28 16:14 -00:59
Running 3 07:35 18:28 06:44 +00:51 19:55 -01:27
Sled Pull 05:58 26:03 06:33 -00:35 26:39 -00:36
Running 4 07:59 32:01 06:43 +01:16 33:12 -01:11
Burpees Broad Jump 07:11 40:00 07:38 -00:27 39:55 +00:05
Running 5 08:09 47:11 07:03 +01:06 47:33 -00:22
Rowing 05:15 55:20 05:22 -00:07 54:36 +00:44
Running 6 08:22 01:00:35 06:51 +01:31 59:58 +00:37
Farmers Carry 02:28 01:08:57 02:44 -00:16 01:06:49 +02:08
Running 7 08:10 01:11:25 06:50 +01:20 01:09:33 +01:52
Sandbag Lunges 06:17 01:19:35 07:01 -00:44 01:16:23 +03:12
Running 8 08:53 01:25:52 08:22 +00:31 01:23:24 +02:28
Wall Balls 06:41 01:34:45 09:12 -02:31 01:31:46 +02:59
Roxzone 09:55 01:51:15 10:17 -00:22 01:51:15
Based on 727 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men

A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer

Overall Performance

David Farr, in his performance at the 2024 Manchester Hyrox race, demonstrated commendable strength and endurance, particularly considering his age category of 60-64. He placed 11th in his age group, placing him in the top 84% of his peers. While his overall rank of 1127 places him within the top 93% of athletes, it's important to note that his performance is being compared to competitors across a wide range of ages.

A key finding from the race is that David's total running time was slower than average by 05:17. This suggests that his strength lies more in the exercise zones than in running segments. His performance in the Roxzone segment was faster than average, indicating a good transition speed between exercises.

In the initial running segments, David started off faster than average but gradually his pace reduced with each running segment. This could be an indication of either starting too fast or a lack of sustained running endurance.

Segments to Improve

Running Segments: David's running performance appears to be the area with the most room for improvement. His total running time was slower than average. This suggests that enhancing his running endurance could significantly improve his overall performance. Specific training strategies could include consistent long distance running, interval training to enhance speed and endurance, hill running for strength, and incorporating plyometric exercises such as jump squats and lunges into his routine to build explosive strength.

Roxzone: Although David performed better than average in the roxzone segment, there is still room to improve. This segment relies heavily on overall fitness and transition time between exercises. Improvements in this area could be achieved by incorporating high-intensity interval training (HIIT) workouts into his routine, focusing on quick transitions between different exercises. Practicing the specific transitions between exercises that occur in the race could also prove beneficial.

Burpees Broad Jump: This segment was one of David's slower performances. He could improve in this area by incorporating more plyometric training into his routine, particularly exercises that mimic the movements of a burpee broad jump. This could include burpees, broad jumps, and box jumps.

Sled Pull: David performed better than average in this segment, but there is still room for improvement. He could benefit from strength training exercises focused on his lower body and core, such as squats, deadlifts, and weighted lunges.

Race Strategies

Pacing: Based on his faster initial running segments and slower later segments, David could benefit from a more consistent pacing strategy. Starting off too fast can lead to early fatigue and slower times in later segments. He should aim to maintain a steady pace throughout the race.

Endurance Training: Given that his total running time was slower than average, David should focus on improving his running endurance. This could involve gradually increasing his long-distance running, and incorporating more endurance-based workouts into his training.

Strength Training: Despite his slower running times, David's performance in the exercise zones was generally better than average. He should continue to focus on strength training, as this appears to be a strong point for him. However, he could benefit from incorporating more functional and compound movements that mimic the specific exercises in the race.

Race History

Explore your race history splits in detail below. The interactive chart provides an easy way to analyze your performance by highlighting faster and slower times across each split. This tool is designed to help you identify trends, track improvements, and refine your strategy for future races.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Similar Athletes
Tant Christian 2024 Melbourne 01:51:28
Gertje Eduard 2023 Karlsruhe 01:51:35
Raccagni Giovanni Luigi 2023 Milan 01:51:21
Mcgill Jarlath 2023 Dublin 01:51:04
Wood Cameron 2022 London 01:51:39
Balice Valerio 2024 Rimini 01:50:54
Langusch Mario 2018 Essen 01:51:04
Galisteo Fernando 2024 Madrid 01:51:37
Johnson Scott 2024 Brisbane 01:51:22
Dornhege Tobias 2018 Essen 01:50:52

Measure Your Performance Against Top Athletes

Other Results from this athlete
2024 Birmingham 02:00:31

Ready to conquer your next race?

Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.

Pace Calculator

Share Your Result on Instagram

We've generated the perfect instagram story for you. Don't forget to tag us @roxcoach and redirect to your result page.

Download