Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 211 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ede Jenni's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ede Jenni's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ede Jenni's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ede Jenni's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:54. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:37 | 05:30 to 03:53 | 27.4% |
| Sled Pull | 01:35 | 06:29 to 04:54 | 26.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:48 | 04:54 to 04:06 | 13.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:40 | 05:30 to 04:50 | 11.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:36 | 03:36 to 03:00 | 10.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:21 | 02:23 to 02:02 | 5.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:42 to 04:30 | 3.4% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:48 to 04:43 | 1.4% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 33:05 to 33:05 | 0.0% |
| Ede Jenni | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:35 | 00:00 | 04:13 +00:22 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 04:35 | 04:36 +00:06 | 04:13 +00:22 |
| Running 2 | 03:59 | 09:17 | 04:28 -00:29 | 08:49 +00:28 |
| Sled Push | 03:36 | 13:16 | 03:24 +00:12 | 13:17 -00:01 |
| Running 3 | 04:02 | 16:52 | 04:46 -00:44 | 16:41 +00:11 |
| Sled Pull | 06:29 | 20:54 | 05:23 +01:06 | 21:27 -00:33 |
| Running 4 | 04:06 | 27:23 | 04:49 -00:43 | 26:50 +00:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:30 | 31:29 | 04:16 +01:14 | 31:39 -00:10 |
| Running 5 | 04:07 | 36:59 | 04:52 -00:45 | 35:55 +01:04 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 41:06 | 04:48 +00:00 | 40:47 +00:19 |
| Running 6 | 04:04 | 45:54 | 04:49 -00:45 | 45:35 +00:19 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:23 | 49:58 | 02:15 +00:08 | 50:24 -00:26 |
| Running 7 | 04:00 | 52:21 | 04:52 -00:52 | 52:39 -00:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:54 | 56:21 | 04:23 +00:31 | 57:31 -01:10 |
| Running 8 | 04:15 | 01:01:15 | 05:04 -00:49 | 01:01:54 -00:39 |
| Wall Balls | 05:30 | 01:05:30 | 05:18 +00:12 | 01:06:58 -01:28 |
| Roxzone | 06:22 | 01:17:16 | 05:00 +01:22 | 01:17:16 |
Jenni Ede shows a commendable performance ranking 30th overall and 6th in her age group. Her total running time of 00:33:05, which is 04:55 faster than the average, indicates her strength in running. It is also noted that she consistently maintained a fast pace throughout the race with her best running lap at 00:03:59. However, we can observe a slower start in the first running segment which is 00:22 slower than average. Jenni exhibits a strong runner profile, but there's an opportunity to improve her performance in strength exercises and transitions (roxzone).
Jenni should focus on pacing herself better at the start of the race to conserve energy for the later stages. She should also aim to minimize the time spent in the roxzone by quickening her transitions between exercises. Jenni could also benefit from focusing on her form and technique during strength exercises to maximize efficiency and prevent fatigue. Additionally, practicing running under fatigued conditions might help her maintain a consistent pace post strength exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Williams Kate | 2023 London | 01:17:13 | |
| Taylor Lyndsey | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:16:50 | |
| Brennan Cara | 2023 Dubai | 01:17:08 | |
| Green Ella | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:17:14 | |
| Moodie Rachel | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:16:59 | |
| Kepler Carey | 2024 Dallas | 01:17:26 | |
| Blank Katharina | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:17:24 | |
| Morawska Julia | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:17:21 | |
| Cordier Almeruscke | 2024 Perth | 01:16:52 | |
| Rogers Anna | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:17:37 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:12:05 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
