Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Donnelly Andy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Donnelly Andy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Donnelly Andy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Donnelly Andy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:03. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:50 | 11:00 to 08:10 | 56.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:11 | 07:58 to 06:47 | 23.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:29 | 06:29 to 06:00 | 9.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:17 | 05:01 to 04:44 | 5.6% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 05:21 to 05:10 | 3.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:05 | 06:21 to 06:16 | 1.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:09 to 02:09 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:56 to 01:56 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 47:30 to 47:30 | 0.0% |
| Donnelly Andy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:47 | 00:00 | 05:12 +00:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:01 | 05:47 | 04:42 +00:19 | 05:12 +00:35 |
| Running 2 | 05:11 | 10:48 | 05:44 -00:33 | 09:54 +00:54 |
| Sled Push | 02:09 | 15:59 | 03:30 -01:21 | 15:38 +00:21 |
| Running 3 | 05:23 | 18:08 | 06:19 -00:56 | 19:08 -01:00 |
| Sled Pull | 06:29 | 23:31 | 06:05 +00:24 | 25:27 -01:56 |
| Running 4 | 05:39 | 30:00 | 06:18 -00:39 | 31:32 -01:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:58 | 35:39 | 06:54 +01:04 | 37:50 -02:11 |
| Running 5 | 05:49 | 43:37 | 06:34 -00:45 | 44:44 -01:07 |
| Rowing | 05:21 | 49:26 | 05:12 +00:09 | 51:18 -01:52 |
| Running 6 | 05:36 | 54:47 | 06:22 -00:46 | 56:30 -01:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 01:00:23 | 02:35 -00:39 | 01:02:52 -02:29 |
| Running 7 | 05:28 | 01:02:19 | 06:20 -00:52 | 01:05:27 -03:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:21 | 01:07:47 | 06:29 -00:08 | 01:11:47 -04:00 |
| Running 8 | 08:40 | 01:14:08 | 07:33 +01:07 | 01:18:16 -04:08 |
| Wall Balls | 11:00 | 01:22:48 | 08:28 +02:32 | 01:25:49 -03:01 |
| Roxzone | 09:44 | 01:43:25 | 09:08 +00:36 | 01:43:25 |
Andy Donnelly's performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX competition was commendable, as he landed in the top 56% of all athletes and the top 50% in his age group. Despite some areas for improvement, his overall time was impressive, achieving a total running time that was 03:08 minutes faster than average. This suggests that Andy has a strong runner profile and excels in endurance-based activities. However, he may need to work on his strength and transition times, as his roxzone time was 00:40 slower than average.
In analyzing the pacing of his performance, it seems that Andy started the race a bit slower than average, but picked up speed quickly, as shown by his faster times in running 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. This suggests he might benefit from a more aggressive start to optimize his overall performance.
For future races, Andy could consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Esskandari Timur | 2019 Essen | 01:43:06 | |
| Wink Reinier | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:43:28 | |
| Hayward Charles | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:43:54 | |
| O'Connor David | 2024 Dublin | 01:43:06 | |
| Moon David | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:43:35 | |
| Pereira Eugene | 2022 London | 01:43:00 | |
| Lipkow Friedemann | 2019 Leipzig | 01:43:50 | |
| EL BAZE ESSAM | 2024 New York | 01:43:03 | |
| Styles Elliot | 2023 London | 01:43:39 | |
| Szczęch Piotr | 2024 Poznan | 01:43:36 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
