Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 496 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cussell Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cussell Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cussell Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cussell Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:44. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 08:44 | 01:02:57 to 54:13 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:35 to 03:35 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:29 to 06:29 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:50 to 07:50 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:16 to 05:16 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:29 to 02:29 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:59 to 05:59 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 09:07 to 09:07 | 0.0% |
| Cussell Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:42 | 00:00 | 05:36 -00:54 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:54 | 04:42 | 04:55 -00:01 | 05:36 -00:54 |
| Running 2 | 06:36 | 09:36 | 06:18 +00:18 | 10:31 -00:55 |
| Sled Push | 03:35 | 16:12 | 03:52 -00:17 | 16:49 -00:37 |
| Running 3 | 07:20 | 19:47 | 07:06 +00:14 | 20:41 -00:54 |
| Sled Pull | 06:29 | 27:07 | 06:56 -00:27 | 27:47 -00:40 |
| Running 4 | 07:36 | 33:36 | 07:07 +00:29 | 34:43 -01:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:50 | 41:12 | 08:12 -00:22 | 41:50 -00:38 |
| Running 5 | 08:13 | 49:02 | 07:25 +00:48 | 50:02 -01:00 |
| Rowing | 05:16 | 57:15 | 05:30 -00:14 | 57:27 -00:12 |
| Running 6 | 08:13 | 01:02:31 | 07:08 +01:05 | 01:02:57 -00:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:29 | 01:10:44 | 02:55 -00:26 | 01:10:05 +00:39 |
| Running 7 | 08:50 | 01:13:13 | 07:15 +01:35 | 01:13:00 +00:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:59 | 01:22:03 | 07:38 -01:39 | 01:20:15 +01:48 |
| Running 8 | 11:31 | 01:28:02 | 08:59 +02:32 | 01:27:53 +00:09 |
| Wall Balls | 09:07 | 01:39:33 | 09:58 -00:51 | 01:36:52 +02:41 |
| Roxzone | 09:01 | 01:57:32 | 10:42 -01:41 | 01:57:32 |
Paul Cussell performed well in the HYROX race, finishing in the top 64% of all athletes and in the top 60% of his age group. His overall time of 01:57:32 is respectable, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance. In terms of pacing, Paul's splits show that he started strong with a faster time in Running 1, but his pace slowed down in subsequent running segments. He has a hybrid profile, as his total running time is slower than average, indicating the need for more running training.
In summary, Paul Cussell's performance in the HYROX race was commendable, but there is room for improvement. By focusing on specific areas of weakness, implementing targeted training strategies, and refining his race strategies, Paul can enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mcgrath Luke | 2024 Glasgow | 01:57:45 | |
| Bratos Domínguez Jesús | 2022 Madrid | 01:57:55 | |
| Rodgers Chris | 2022 Birmingham | 01:57:09 | |
| Foreman Scott | 2023 London | 01:57:56 | |
| Dean Steven | 2022 London | 01:57:17 | |
| De Haan Roy | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:57:06 | |
| Gysel Theo | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:57:06 | |
| Kaufmann André | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:57:06 | |
| 常 乐 | 2024 Beijing | 01:57:21 | |
| SL Craig | 2024 Manchester | 01:57:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:52:17 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
