Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 846 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Coombs Mark's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Coombs Mark hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Coombs Mark’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Coombs Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:57. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:04 | 04:25 to 03:21 | 36.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:40 | 04:57 to 04:17 | 22.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:36 | 03:52 to 03:16 | 20.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:15 to 04:00 | 8.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:09 | 02:03 to 01:54 | 5.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:05 | 03:34 to 03:29 | 2.8% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:21 to 04:17 | 2.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 01:36 to 01:32 | 2.3% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 32:30 to 32:30 | 0.0% |
| Coombs Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:33 | 00:00 | 03:47 +00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 04:33 | 04:07 +00:08 | 03:47 +00:46 |
| Running 2 | 03:46 | 08:48 | 04:01 -00:15 | 07:54 +00:54 |
| Sled Push | 02:03 | 12:34 | 02:20 -00:17 | 11:55 +00:39 |
| Running 3 | 04:11 | 14:37 | 04:17 -00:06 | 14:15 +00:22 |
| Sled Pull | 04:25 | 18:48 | 03:39 +00:46 | 18:32 +00:16 |
| Running 4 | 03:59 | 23:13 | 04:16 -00:17 | 22:11 +01:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:52 | 27:12 | 03:35 +00:17 | 26:27 +00:45 |
| Running 5 | 04:02 | 31:04 | 04:22 -00:20 | 30:02 +01:02 |
| Rowing | 04:21 | 35:06 | 04:21 +00:00 | 34:24 +00:42 |
| Running 6 | 04:05 | 39:27 | 04:18 -00:13 | 38:45 +00:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:36 | 43:32 | 01:42 -00:06 | 43:03 +00:29 |
| Running 7 | 03:56 | 45:08 | 04:18 -00:22 | 44:45 +00:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:34 | 49:04 | 03:42 -00:08 | 49:03 +00:01 |
| Running 8 | 04:02 | 52:38 | 04:34 -00:32 | 52:45 -00:07 |
| Wall Balls | 04:57 | 56:40 | 04:38 +00:19 | 57:19 -00:39 |
| Roxzone | 05:01 | 01:06:28 | 04:31 +00:30 | 01:06:28 |
Mark Coombs demonstrated an impressive performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event. His overall rank of 118 out of 4107 athletes places him in the top 2% of all participants. Specifically, he shines on the running segments, where he finished with a total running time of 32 minutes and 30 seconds, which is 01:36 faster than the average competitor. His best running lap was completed in 3 minutes and 46 seconds. However, it appears that Mark started off slower than average in the first running segment but then picked up the pace and maintained it for the rest of the race. This indicates that Mark might have a running profile, excelling in endurance and pacing.
To improve his future performance, Mark should implement the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Callum | 2024 Birmingham | 01:06:18 | |
| Sloane Timothy | 2024 Sydney | 01:06:26 | |
| Casey O' Shea Michael | 2024 Dublin | 01:06:43 | |
| Hudson Grant | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:06:08 | |
| Akbary Seena | 2024 Cape Town | 01:06:03 | |
| Voigt David | 2018 Hamburg | 01:06:54 | |
| Graignic Maxime | 2024 Paris | 01:06:56 | |
| Kruse Tom | 2023 Hannover | 01:06:49 | |
| Matet Anthony | 2024 Marseille | 01:06:18 | |
| Husmann Hendrik | 2023 Hamburg | 01:06:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Stockholm | 01:01:50 | |
| 2024 London | 01:04:46 | |
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:10:42 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
