Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Conn Charlotte's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Conn Charlotte's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Conn Charlotte's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Conn Charlotte's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:46 | 06:57 to 04:11 | 40.6% |
| Sled Pull | 01:31 | 06:37 to 05:06 | 22.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:55 | 05:17 to 04:22 | 13.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:35 | 06:01 to 05:26 | 8.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:20 | 02:46 to 02:26 | 4.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:20 | 02:23 to 02:03 | 4.9% |
| Rowing | 00:14 | 05:26 to 05:12 | 3.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 05:05 to 04:57 | 2.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:01 to 40:01 | 0.0% |
| Conn Charlotte | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:24 | 00:00 | 05:01 +00:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:05 | 05:24 | 05:03 +00:02 | 05:01 +00:23 |
| Running 2 | 04:44 | 10:29 | 05:19 -00:35 | 10:04 +00:25 |
| Sled Push | 02:46 | 15:13 | 02:39 +00:07 | 15:23 -00:10 |
| Running 3 | 04:54 | 17:59 | 05:37 -00:43 | 18:02 -00:03 |
| Sled Pull | 06:37 | 22:53 | 05:31 +01:06 | 23:39 -00:46 |
| Running 4 | 04:54 | 29:30 | 05:39 -00:45 | 29:10 +00:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:01 | 34:24 | 05:48 +00:13 | 34:49 -00:25 |
| Running 5 | 05:03 | 40:25 | 05:47 -00:44 | 40:37 -00:12 |
| Rowing | 05:26 | 45:28 | 05:18 +00:08 | 46:24 -00:56 |
| Running 6 | 04:55 | 50:54 | 05:40 -00:45 | 51:42 -00:48 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:23 | 55:49 | 02:11 +00:12 | 57:22 -01:33 |
| Running 7 | 04:54 | 58:12 | 05:38 -00:44 | 59:33 -01:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:17 | 01:03:06 | 04:36 +00:41 | 01:05:11 -02:05 |
| Running 8 | 05:16 | 01:08:23 | 06:03 -00:47 | 01:09:47 -01:24 |
| Wall Balls | 06:57 | 01:13:39 | 04:44 +02:13 | 01:15:50 -02:11 |
| Roxzone | 06:42 | 01:27:08 | 06:34 +00:08 | 01:27:08 |
Charlotte Conn has put forth a commendable performance, placing herself in the top 10% of all participants and top 12% within her age group. She demonstrates a strong running profile, with her total running time being 05:03 faster than the average. However, she seems to have started a bit slower than average in the first running segment, but quickly adapted and improved her speed in the subsequent segments. This indicates a strong pacing strategy where she preserved her energy for later segments.
While her running performance is excellent, there are several segments where she can improve:
To improve her overall race performance, Charlotte should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Macdonald Megan | 2024 Madrid | 01:26:49 | |
| Simpson Sarah | 2024 Malaga | 01:27:00 | |
| Taylor Teresa | 2024 London | 01:26:55 | |
| Henschel Laura | 2024 New York | 01:26:51 | |
| Ertl Hannah | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:27:04 | |
| Herrick Kyla | 2024 Sydney | 01:27:30 | |
| Wilkie Helen | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:26:38 | |
| Hirabayashi Momori | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:27:37 | |
| Main Emma | 2024 Glasgow | 01:26:46 | |
| Ennis Niamh | 2019 New York | 01:27:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
