Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Charles Rebecca's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Charles Rebecca's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Charles Rebecca's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Charles Rebecca's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:47. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 04:47 | 10:09 to 05:22 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:08 to 05:08 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:33 to 02:33 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:45 to 05:45 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:37 to 06:37 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:10 to 05:10 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 46:46 to 46:46 | 0.0% |
| Charles Rebecca | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:15 | 00:00 | 05:29 +00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:08 | 06:15 | 05:17 -00:09 | 05:29 +00:46 |
| Running 2 | 05:36 | 11:23 | 05:51 -00:15 | 10:46 +00:37 |
| Sled Push | 02:33 | 16:59 | 02:59 -00:26 | 16:37 +00:22 |
| Running 3 | 05:46 | 19:32 | 06:14 -00:28 | 19:36 -00:04 |
| Sled Pull | 05:45 | 25:18 | 06:19 -00:34 | 25:50 -00:32 |
| Running 4 | 05:47 | 31:03 | 06:12 -00:25 | 32:09 -01:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:37 | 36:50 | 07:05 -00:28 | 38:21 -01:31 |
| Running 5 | 05:45 | 43:27 | 06:25 -00:40 | 45:26 -01:59 |
| Rowing | 05:10 | 49:12 | 05:36 -00:26 | 51:51 -02:39 |
| Running 6 | 05:47 | 54:22 | 06:17 -00:30 | 57:27 -03:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:14 | 01:00:09 | 02:26 -00:12 | 01:03:44 -03:35 |
| Running 7 | 05:48 | 01:02:23 | 06:16 -00:28 | 01:06:10 -03:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:05 | 01:08:11 | 05:22 -00:17 | 01:12:26 -04:15 |
| Running 8 | 06:05 | 01:13:16 | 06:53 -00:48 | 01:17:48 -04:32 |
| Wall Balls | 10:09 | 01:19:21 | 05:46 +04:23 | 01:24:41 -05:20 |
| Roxzone | 08:56 | 01:38:18 | 07:51 +01:05 | 01:38:18 |
Rebecca Charles demonstrated an impressive performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, finishing in the top 20% of all participants and top 19% in her age group (40-44). Her overall time was 01:38:18, a commendable achievement for her category. Additionally, Rebecca excelled in her running time, finishing 03:15 faster than the average, with her best running lap being 00:05:36. This indicates a strong running profile and suggests that she maintained a consistent pace throughout the race, ensuring that she didn't start too fast or slow. However, some areas, such as the Wall Balls and Roxzone, could use improvement.
To further improve her race performance, Rebecca can implement the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wu Fei | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:37:55 | |
| Mckeown Sarah | 2024 London | 01:38:20 | |
| Schwarz JeanneMarie | 2024 Berlin | 01:38:44 | |
| Chabrefy Marion | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:38:19 | |
| Espinosa Almeida Maria | 2023 Malaga | 01:38:03 | |
| Van Bussel Floor | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:38:01 | |
| Duckworth Lynn | 2024 Birmingham | 01:37:55 | |
| David Rachel | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:38:29 | |
| Dale Naomi | 2022 London | 01:38:24 | |
| Ragusin Sherrie | 2024 Houston | 01:38:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
