Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Benson Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Benson Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Benson Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Benson Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 13:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 08:38 | 14:26 to 05:48 | 62.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 03:10 | 05:09 to 01:59 | 22.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:08 | 05:46 to 04:38 | 8.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:34 | 05:02 to 04:28 | 4.1% |
| Rowing | 00:18 | 04:58 to 04:40 | 2.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:03 | 04:49 to 04:46 | 0.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:21 to 04:20 | 0.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:34 to 02:34 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 29:24 to 29:24 | 0.0% |
| Benson Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:52 | 00:00 | 04:30 -00:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 03:52 | 04:24 -00:03 | 04:30 -00:38 |
| Running 2 | 03:12 | 08:13 | 04:52 -01:40 | 08:54 -00:41 |
| Sled Push | 02:34 | 11:25 | 02:52 -00:18 | 13:46 -02:21 |
| Running 3 | 03:46 | 13:59 | 05:16 -01:30 | 16:38 -02:39 |
| Sled Pull | 05:02 | 17:45 | 04:47 +00:15 | 21:54 -04:09 |
| Running 4 | 03:27 | 22:47 | 05:14 -01:47 | 26:41 -03:54 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:49 | 26:14 | 05:03 -00:14 | 31:55 -05:41 |
| Running 5 | 03:41 | 31:03 | 05:23 -01:42 | 36:58 -05:55 |
| Rowing | 04:58 | 34:44 | 04:45 +00:13 | 42:21 -07:37 |
| Running 6 | 03:35 | 39:42 | 05:16 -01:41 | 47:06 -07:24 |
| Farmers Carry | 05:09 | 43:17 | 02:08 +03:01 | 52:22 -09:05 |
| Running 7 | 03:44 | 48:26 | 05:15 -01:31 | 54:30 -06:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:46 | 52:10 | 04:55 +00:51 | 59:45 -07:35 |
| Running 8 | 04:11 | 57:56 | 05:48 -01:37 | 01:04:40 -06:44 |
| Wall Balls | 14:26 | 01:02:07 | 06:16 +08:10 | 01:10:28 -08:21 |
| Roxzone | 06:47 | 01:23:12 | 06:28 +00:19 | 01:23:12 |
Andrew Benson put forth a commendable effort in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. Ranking in the top 29% of all athletes and top 33% in his age group, his performance was particularly outstanding in the running segments. With a total running time of 00:29:24, he was 12:25 faster than the average competitor, suggesting a strong runner profile. His best running lap came in at a swift 00:03:12. A closer look at the splits from running 1 to running 4 reveals that Andrew started stronger and faster than the average competitor.
Based on his performance, Andrew should consider the following strategies for future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Shannon Jack | 2024 Sydney | 01:22:44 | |
| Simonovic Marek | 2022 London | 01:23:17 | |
| Reshetnikov Serge | 2024 Houston | 01:22:45 | |
| Schicho Thomas | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:22:46 | |
| Rodgerson Mark | 2023 Glasgow | 01:22:55 | |
| Mckee Shane | 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:01 | |
| Marin Costanilla Angel | 2022 Valencia | 01:23:07 | |
| Cleary Conor | 2024 Madrid | 01:23:19 | |
| Brouwer Erik | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:22:48 | |
| Karnefors Magnus | 2024 Stockholm | 01:22:56 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
