Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 524 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Albay Gizem Cigdem's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Albay Gizem Cigdem's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Albay Gizem Cigdem's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Albay Gizem Cigdem's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:42 | 07:43 to 06:01 | 37.8% |
| Run Total | 01:35 | 55:07 to 53:32 | 35.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:47 | 08:51 to 08:04 | 17.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:22 | 06:58 to 06:36 | 8.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 | 03:23 to 03:19 | 1.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:17 to 05:17 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:18 to 02:18 | 0.0% |
| Albay Gizem Cigdem | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:43 | 00:00 | 05:47 -00:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:15 | 05:43 | 05:30 -00:15 | 05:47 -00:04 |
| Running 2 | 06:25 | 10:58 | 06:24 +00:01 | 11:17 -00:19 |
| Sled Push | 03:23 | 17:23 | 03:22 +00:01 | 17:41 -00:18 |
| Running 3 | 06:55 | 20:46 | 06:47 +00:08 | 21:03 -00:17 |
| Sled Pull | 05:03 | 27:41 | 07:17 -02:14 | 27:50 -00:09 |
| Running 4 | 06:57 | 32:44 | 06:54 +00:03 | 35:07 -02:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:51 | 39:41 | 08:20 +00:31 | 42:01 -02:20 |
| Running 5 | 06:54 | 48:32 | 07:11 -00:17 | 50:21 -01:49 |
| Rowing | 05:17 | 55:26 | 05:49 -00:32 | 57:32 -02:06 |
| Running 6 | 06:59 | 01:00:43 | 06:57 +00:02 | 01:03:21 -02:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 01:07:42 | 02:40 -00:22 | 01:10:18 -02:36 |
| Running 7 | 07:06 | 01:10:00 | 06:59 +00:07 | 01:12:58 -02:58 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:43 | 01:17:06 | 06:16 +01:27 | 01:19:57 -02:51 |
| Running 8 | 08:12 | 01:24:49 | 07:45 +00:27 | 01:26:13 -01:24 |
| Wall Balls | 06:58 | 01:33:01 | 06:44 +00:14 | 01:33:58 -00:57 |
| Roxzone | 10:01 | 01:49:50 | 09:08 +00:53 | 01:49:50 |
Based on the splits analysis, it can be observed that Gizem performed particularly well in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, where she was faster than the average. However, she struggled in segments such as the Burpees Broad Jump, Wall Balls, and the Roxzone, where she lost significant time compared to the average.
Gizem's running performance was slightly slower than the average, with a total running time of 00:55:07. This suggests that she may benefit from focusing more on improving her running abilities.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas of improvement, Gizem Cigdem Albay can enhance her performance in future Hyrox races and achieve better results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| de Charmoy Brittney | 2022 Dallas | 01:49:20 | |
| Lai Olivia | 2024 Melbourne | 01:50:10 | |
| Devenish Alison | 2023 Dublin | 01:49:36 | |
| Menacho Ruiz Inmaculada | 2023 Malaga | 01:49:53 | |
| Van Den Boogaard Barbara | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:50:13 | |
| Dubanowski Melanie | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:49:25 | |
| Mcdonagh Katie | 2024 Dublin | 01:49:34 | |
| Wilson Rachel | 2024 Melbourne | 01:50:12 | |
| Reynolds Natalie | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:49:35 | |
| Bennett Ruth | 2024 Dublin | 01:50:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
