Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 719 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Talbot Hannah Elizabeth's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Talbot Hannah Elizabeth's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Talbot Hannah Elizabeth's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Talbot Hannah Elizabeth's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:03. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:51 | 08:16 to 07:25 | 41.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:30 | 06:07 to 05:37 | 24.4% |
| Run Total | 00:23 | 51:39 to 51:16 | 18.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:11 | 06:11 to 06:00 | 8.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 | 02:38 to 02:30 | 6.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:07 to 05:07 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:44 to 02:44 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:03 to 06:03 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:08 to 05:08 | 0.0% |
| Talbot Hannah Elizabeth | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:29 | 00:00 | 05:36 +00:53 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:07 | 06:29 | 05:23 -00:16 | 05:36 +00:53 |
| Running 2 | 06:00 | 11:36 | 06:09 -00:09 | 10:59 +00:37 |
| Sled Push | 02:44 | 17:36 | 03:07 -00:23 | 17:08 +00:28 |
| Running 3 | 07:03 | 20:20 | 06:32 +00:31 | 20:15 +00:05 |
| Sled Pull | 06:03 | 27:23 | 06:47 -00:44 | 26:47 +00:36 |
| Running 4 | 06:29 | 33:26 | 06:35 -00:06 | 33:34 -00:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:16 | 39:55 | 07:41 +00:35 | 40:09 -00:14 |
| Running 5 | 06:27 | 48:11 | 06:47 -00:20 | 47:50 +00:21 |
| Rowing | 05:08 | 54:38 | 05:42 -00:34 | 54:37 +00:01 |
| Running 6 | 06:51 | 59:46 | 06:43 +00:08 | 01:00:19 -00:33 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:38 | 01:06:37 | 02:33 +00:05 | 01:07:02 -00:25 |
| Running 7 | 06:12 | 01:09:15 | 06:39 -00:27 | 01:09:35 -00:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:07 | 01:15:27 | 05:52 +00:15 | 01:16:14 -00:47 |
| Running 8 | 06:11 | 01:21:34 | 07:31 -01:20 | 01:22:06 -00:32 |
| Wall Balls | 06:11 | 01:27:45 | 06:08 +00:03 | 01:29:37 -01:52 |
| Roxzone | 10:32 | 01:44:21 | 08:36 +01:56 | 01:44:21 |
Hannah Elizabeth Talbot, competing in the 25-29 age group, delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. Her overall rank of 1030 placed her within the top 25% of all 4107 competing athletes. Within her age group, she ranked 202, positioning her in the top 30%. Her total running time was 00:51:39, which was faster than the average by 01:18, suggesting a strong runner profile. However, her slower roxzone time indicates that she may benefit from focusing on improving her overall fitness level and transition times. Her pacing was generally consistent, although there were a few segments where she started slower than average.
Several segments stand out as areas with potential for improvement, including:
Looking ahead to future races, there are a few strategies that Hannah can implement to potentially improve her performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mclachlan Sara | 2023 Dublin | 01:44:38 | |
| Vázquez Clara | 2024 Madrid | 01:43:53 | |
| Kaas Steensen Karina | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:44:43 | |
| Mckay Rebecca | 2024 Sydney | 01:44:17 | |
| Tsui Man Ying Ammi | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:44:24 | |
| Correia Mercedes | 2024 Glasgow | 01:44:22 | |
| Hodson Melissa | 2024 London | 01:43:56 | |
| Kennedy Jenny | 2024 Glasgow | 01:44:08 | |
| Z Sab | 2023 Paris | 01:44:15 | |
| Ashmore Jodie | 2022 London | 01:44:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
