Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 739 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Schreuder Maud's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Schreuder Maud's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Schreuder Maud's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Schreuder Maud's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:51 | 52:51 to 51:00 | 50.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:49 | 06:45 to 05:56 | 22.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:43 | 06:17 to 05:34 | 19.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:14 | 07:35 to 07:21 | 6.4% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 05:42 to 05:39 | 1.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:35 to 02:35 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:55 to 05:55 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:02 to 02:02 | 0.0% |
| Schreuder Maud | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:10 | 00:00 | 05:37 -01:27 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:00 | 04:10 | 05:22 -00:22 | 05:37 -01:27 |
| Running 2 | 06:39 | 09:10 | 06:08 +00:31 | 10:59 -01:49 |
| Sled Push | 02:35 | 15:49 | 03:07 -00:32 | 17:07 -01:18 |
| Running 3 | 06:45 | 18:24 | 06:31 +00:14 | 20:14 -01:50 |
| Sled Pull | 05:55 | 25:09 | 06:45 -00:50 | 26:45 -01:36 |
| Running 4 | 06:48 | 31:04 | 06:34 +00:14 | 33:30 -02:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:35 | 37:52 | 07:35 +00:00 | 40:04 -02:12 |
| Running 5 | 07:14 | 45:27 | 06:45 +00:29 | 47:39 -02:12 |
| Rowing | 05:42 | 52:41 | 05:42 +00:00 | 54:24 -01:43 |
| Running 6 | 06:28 | 58:23 | 06:37 -00:09 | 01:00:06 -01:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:02 | 01:04:51 | 02:31 -00:29 | 01:06:43 -01:52 |
| Running 7 | 06:42 | 01:06:53 | 06:37 +00:05 | 01:09:14 -02:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:17 | 01:13:35 | 05:42 +00:35 | 01:15:51 -02:16 |
| Running 8 | 08:08 | 01:19:52 | 07:16 +00:52 | 01:21:33 -01:41 |
| Wall Balls | 06:45 | 01:28:00 | 06:09 +00:36 | 01:28:49 -00:49 |
| Roxzone | 08:48 | 01:43:25 | 08:27 +00:21 | 01:43:25 |
Maud Schreuder, in the 2024 Amsterdam event, delivered an impressive performance, placing in the top 23% of 3321 athletes and ranking 175 in her age group. Her overall time of 01:43:25 is commendable given the rigorous nature of the HYROX race.
Her total running time was 00:52:51, just 00:04 faster than the average, indicating a well-balanced profile between running and strength. However, it's crucial to note that Maud started the race faster than the average pace, suggesting she could better manage her energy output at the initial stages of the race.
There were several segments where Maud was slower than the average, which could be focus areas for improvement:
Considering Maud's performance, the following strategies could be implemented for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Olivera Pilar | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:43:11 | |
| Love Sarah | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:43:20 | |
| Went Stephanie | 2024 Manchester | 01:43:07 | |
| Muhle Katharina | 2020 Hannover | 01:43:06 | |
| Follos Dawn | 2023 London | 01:43:51 | |
| Raman Kavya | 2023 Milan | 01:43:46 | |
| Griffiths Kerri Lee | 2024 Melbourne | 01:43:18 | |
| Wijnstein Inèz | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:43:18 | |
| Smith Kaya | 2023 Birmingham | 01:43:03 | |
| Becker Julia | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:43:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
