Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 156 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Fogarty Philip's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Fogarty Philip's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Fogarty Philip's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Fogarty Philip's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 12:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 08:43 | 01:07:09 to 58:26 | 68.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:00 | 10:52 to 08:52 | 15.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:59 | 10:10 to 08:11 | 15.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:36 to 03:36 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:39 to 05:39 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:52 to 01:52 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 09:09 to 09:09 | 0.0% |
| Fogarty Philip | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 08:12 | 00:00 | 05:55 +02:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:55 | 08:12 | 05:06 -00:11 | 05:55 +02:17 |
| Running 2 | 07:08 | 13:07 | 07:05 +00:03 | 11:01 +02:06 |
| Sled Push | 03:36 | 20:15 | 04:25 -00:49 | 18:06 +02:09 |
| Running 3 | 07:25 | 23:51 | 08:07 -00:42 | 22:31 +01:20 |
| Sled Pull | 05:39 | 31:16 | 08:09 -02:30 | 30:38 +00:38 |
| Running 4 | 07:39 | 36:55 | 08:00 -00:21 | 38:47 -01:52 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:52 | 44:34 | 09:21 +01:31 | 46:47 -02:13 |
| Running 5 | 08:05 | 55:26 | 08:39 -00:34 | 56:08 -00:42 |
| Rowing | 05:35 | 01:03:31 | 05:46 -00:11 | 01:04:47 -01:16 |
| Running 6 | 08:38 | 01:09:06 | 08:14 +00:24 | 01:10:33 -01:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:52 | 01:17:44 | 03:09 -01:17 | 01:18:47 -01:03 |
| Running 7 | 08:23 | 01:19:36 | 08:21 +00:02 | 01:21:56 -02:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 10:10 | 01:27:59 | 09:08 +01:02 | 01:30:17 -02:18 |
| Running 8 | 11:42 | 01:38:09 | 11:14 +00:28 | 01:39:25 -01:16 |
| Wall Balls | 09:09 | 01:49:51 | 11:50 -02:41 | 01:50:39 -00:48 |
| Roxzone | 16:12 | 02:15:04 | 12:35 +03:37 | 02:15:04 |
Philip Fogarty, competing in the age group of 40-44, finished in the top 65% of all athletes in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race. He showed a balanced profile, with solid performances both in running and strength segments. However, his total running time was slightly slower than average, indicating a need for further running training. His pacing during the race was generally consistent, but he started a bit slower on Running 1. His strength was particularly evident in the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Farmers Carry segments, where he significantly outperformed the average times.
While Philip demonstrated robust performance in many areas, certain aspects of his performance could be improved for future races. Specifically, four segments stand out for their potential for improvement: Roxzone, Total Run, Sandbag Lunges, and Burpees Broad Jump.
For future races, Philip should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Anderson Nigel | 2024 Melbourne | 02:14:49 | |
| Pena Estevan | 2022 Los Angeles | 02:14:57 | |
| Cumberbatch Kristian | 2024 Glasgow | 02:14:42 | |
| Perrin Steve | 2023 New York | 02:14:51 | |
| Manuel Fernandes Carlos | 2024 Malaga | 02:14:55 | |
| Davis Omar | 2020 Chicago | 02:14:41 | |
| Murungi Kenny | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 02:14:38 | |
| Celeste Charles | 2024 Anaheim | 02:14:42 | |
| Nitze Tiziano | 2024 Köln | 02:15:06 | |
| Koschelnik Maxim | 2019 Frankfurt | 02:15:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
