Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Weary Alana's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Weary Alana's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Weary Alana's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Weary Alana's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:07 | 46:17 to 43:10 | 56.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:21 | 06:39 to 05:18 | 24.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:38 | 05:39 to 05:01 | 11.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:16 | 02:39 to 02:23 | 4.8% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 05:17 to 05:10 | 2.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 05:00 to 04:55 | 1.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:52 to 01:52 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:48 to 03:48 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:36 to 03:36 | 0.0% |
| Weary Alana | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:07 | 00:00 | 04:59 -00:52 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:00 | 04:07 | 05:02 -00:02 | 04:59 -00:52 |
| Running 2 | 05:35 | 09:07 | 05:18 +00:17 | 10:01 -00:54 |
| Sled Push | 02:39 | 14:42 | 02:36 +00:03 | 15:19 -00:37 |
| Running 3 | 05:48 | 17:21 | 05:35 +00:13 | 17:55 -00:34 |
| Sled Pull | 05:39 | 23:09 | 05:26 +00:13 | 23:30 -00:21 |
| Running 4 | 05:51 | 28:48 | 05:37 +00:14 | 28:56 -00:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:39 | 34:39 | 05:44 +00:55 | 34:33 +00:06 |
| Running 5 | 05:57 | 41:18 | 05:45 +00:12 | 40:17 +01:01 |
| Rowing | 05:17 | 47:15 | 05:17 +00:00 | 46:02 +01:13 |
| Running 6 | 05:59 | 52:32 | 05:39 +00:20 | 51:19 +01:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:52 | 58:31 | 02:10 -00:18 | 56:58 +01:33 |
| Running 7 | 06:04 | 01:00:23 | 05:37 +00:27 | 59:08 +01:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:48 | 01:06:27 | 04:31 -00:43 | 01:04:45 +01:42 |
| Running 8 | 07:00 | 01:10:15 | 05:59 +01:01 | 01:09:16 +00:59 |
| Wall Balls | 03:36 | 01:17:15 | 04:43 -01:07 | 01:15:15 +02:00 |
| Roxzone | 05:45 | 01:26:27 | 06:29 -00:44 | 01:26:27 |
Alana Weary delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Sydney Hyrox event, ranking 143rd overall and 24th in her age group. She finished in the top 13% of all athletes, showcasing her competitive edge. Notably, Alana exhibits a hybrid profile, with balanced strengths in both running and strength exercises. However, her total running time was slightly slower than average, pointing to an area for improvement in endurance running. Her initial laps were faster, indicating a strong start, but she slowed down significantly in later stages, suggesting possible issues with pace management.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sellke Mary | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:26:29 | |
| Kitt Michelle | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:26:45 | |
| Urgese Tanja | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:26:16 | |
| Ashton Charlotte | 2022 London | 01:26:10 | |
| Britoschek Maya | 2022 Hamburg | 01:26:02 | |
| Abbott Kelly | 2024 Manchester | 01:26:03 | |
| Cherry Phoebe | 2024 Dublin | 01:26:15 | |
| Gatzsche Damaris | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:26:52 | |
| Warner Alex | 2023 London | 01:25:57 | |
| Landman Vicky | 2024 Melbourne | 01:26:10 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
