Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Walsh Dan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Walsh Dan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Walsh Dan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Walsh Dan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:41 | 06:39 to 04:58 | 57.4% |
| Sled Pull | 01:04 | 05:40 to 04:36 | 36.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:05 | 06:06 to 06:01 | 2.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:04 | 04:52 to 04:48 | 2.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 02:43 to 02:41 | 1.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:59 to 01:59 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:05 to 39:05 | 0.0% |
| Walsh Dan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:47 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:01 | 04:47 | 04:26 -00:25 | 04:35 +00:12 |
| Running 2 | 04:20 | 08:48 | 04:55 -00:35 | 09:01 -00:13 |
| Sled Push | 02:43 | 13:08 | 02:51 -00:08 | 13:56 -00:48 |
| Running 3 | 05:05 | 15:51 | 05:21 -00:16 | 16:47 -00:56 |
| Sled Pull | 05:40 | 20:56 | 04:52 +00:48 | 22:08 -01:12 |
| Running 4 | 04:57 | 26:36 | 05:20 -00:23 | 27:00 -00:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:39 | 31:33 | 05:16 +01:23 | 32:20 -00:47 |
| Running 5 | 05:09 | 38:12 | 05:30 -00:21 | 37:36 +00:36 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 43:21 | 04:48 -00:09 | 43:06 +00:15 |
| Running 6 | 04:38 | 48:00 | 05:21 -00:43 | 47:54 +00:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 52:38 | 02:10 -00:11 | 53:15 -00:37 |
| Running 7 | 04:44 | 54:37 | 05:20 -00:36 | 55:25 -00:48 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:52 | 59:21 | 05:02 -00:10 | 01:00:45 -01:24 |
| Running 8 | 05:28 | 01:04:13 | 05:57 -00:29 | 01:05:47 -01:34 |
| Wall Balls | 06:06 | 01:09:41 | 06:27 -00:21 | 01:11:44 -02:03 |
| Roxzone | 09:15 | 01:24:56 | 06:45 +02:30 | 01:24:56 |
Dan Walsh showed commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event. He finished with an overall time of 01:24:56, placing him in the top 32% of all participants and the top 38% in his age group of 30-34. He demonstrated superior running skills, finishing with a total running time of 00:39:05, which is 03:29 faster than the average competitor. However, his time spent in the roxzone was significantly slower, indicating a need for improved transition times and overall fitness.
From the split analysis, it is evident that Dan started off slightly slower than average in the initial running segment but quickly picked up speed. This suggests that Dan might benefit from a more aggressive start. His strongest segments were related to running, which implies that he has a runner's profile and needs to focus more on improving strength to balance his overall performance.
To achieve better performance in the next race, Dan should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Shepherd Toby | 2024 Bilbao | 01:24:41 | |
| Mccreery Heath | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:25:00 | |
| Pakvis Rico | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:24:47 | |
| Mcmahon Michael | 2024 Brisbane | 01:25:21 | |
| Dionisio Gavin | 2024 New York | 01:24:49 | |
| Lürtzing Christopher | 2019 Leipzig | 01:25:03 | |
| Sidgwick Christopher | 2024 Stockholm | 01:24:35 | |
| Brüderl Tristan | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:24:51 | |
| Wagner Danny | 2021 Hamburg | 01:24:29 | |
| Burns Scott | 2024 Madrid | 01:24:37 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
