Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Wall Greg's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Wall Greg's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Wall Greg's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Wall Greg's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:22. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:38 | 38:40 to 37:02 | 30.4% |
| Sled Push | 01:10 | 03:24 to 02:14 | 21.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:49 | 04:51 to 04:02 | 15.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:47 | 04:39 to 03:52 | 14.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:34 | 05:32 to 04:58 | 10.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 | 04:28 to 04:10 | 5.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:06 | 04:04 to 03:58 | 1.9% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:41 to 01:41 | 0.0% |
| Wall Greg | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:24 | 00:00 | 04:14 +01:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 05:24 | 04:17 +00:11 | 04:14 +01:10 |
| Running 2 | 04:21 | 09:52 | 04:31 -00:10 | 08:31 +01:21 |
| Sled Push | 03:24 | 14:13 | 02:36 +00:48 | 13:02 +01:11 |
| Running 3 | 04:45 | 17:37 | 04:52 -00:07 | 15:38 +01:59 |
| Sled Pull | 04:39 | 22:22 | 04:18 +00:21 | 20:30 +01:52 |
| Running 4 | 04:41 | 27:01 | 04:50 -00:09 | 24:48 +02:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:04 | 31:42 | 04:28 -00:24 | 29:38 +02:04 |
| Running 5 | 04:43 | 35:46 | 04:57 -00:14 | 34:06 +01:40 |
| Rowing | 04:24 | 40:29 | 04:35 -00:11 | 39:03 +01:26 |
| Running 6 | 04:41 | 44:53 | 04:52 -00:11 | 43:38 +01:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:41 | 49:34 | 01:56 -00:15 | 48:30 +01:04 |
| Running 7 | 04:50 | 51:15 | 04:50 +00:00 | 50:26 +00:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:51 | 56:05 | 04:25 +00:26 | 55:16 +00:49 |
| Running 8 | 05:18 | 01:00:56 | 05:13 +00:05 | 59:41 +01:15 |
| Wall Balls | 05:32 | 01:06:14 | 05:32 +00:00 | 01:04:54 +01:20 |
| Roxzone | 04:24 | 01:16:04 | 05:38 -01:14 | 01:16:04 |
Pacing and Profile:
Based on the splits analysis, Greg started the race at a slightly slower pace compared to the average in the first few segments, including Running 1, Ski Erg, and Sled Push. However, he made up for this slower start by performing better than average in subsequent segments, particularly in Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, and Burpees Broad Jump. This indicates that Greg has the potential to start the race at a faster pace and push himself more in the early stages. Additionally, his Total running time of 00:38:40 suggests that he has a stronger profile as a runner. To improve his overall performance, Greg should focus on balancing his pacing and incorporating more strength training into his routine.
Overall, Greg Wall had a strong performance in the 2023 Manchester Hyrox race. By focusing on pacing, incorporating strength training, practicing transitions, and refining his form and technique, he can further enhance his performance and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Müller Julian | 2024 Hamburg | 01:16:07 | |
| Rohrmoser Jochen | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:16:32 | |
| Spina Isaac | 2024 Melbourne | 01:15:53 | |
| Saaidi Hamza | 2023 Madrid | 01:16:10 | |
| Walker Jack | 2024 Birmingham | 01:16:10 | |
| Eberle Andreas | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:15:39 | |
| LightfootBrown Max | 2024 Sydney | 01:15:55 | |
| Halley Ross | 2023 Birmingham | 01:16:01 | |
| Trew Karl | 2023 Glasgow | 01:15:52 | |
| Rosier Thomas | 2024 Malaga | 01:16:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:23:57 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:40:44 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
