Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Hoof Mitchel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Hoof Mitchel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Hoof Mitchel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Hoof Mitchel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:57. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:47 | 41:16 to 37:29 | 76.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:43 | 02:29 to 01:46 | 14.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:23 | 02:40 to 02:17 | 7.7% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:33 to 04:30 | 1.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:01 | 04:05 to 04:04 | 0.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:55 to 03:55 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 02:55 to 02:55 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:57 to 03:57 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Van Hoof Mitchel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:22 | 00:00 | 04:15 -00:53 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:55 | 03:22 | 04:18 -00:23 | 04:15 -00:53 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 07:17 | 04:33 +00:17 | 08:33 -01:16 |
| Sled Push | 02:40 | 12:07 | 02:37 +00:03 | 13:06 -00:59 |
| Running 3 | 05:18 | 14:47 | 04:55 +00:23 | 15:43 -00:56 |
| Sled Pull | 02:55 | 20:05 | 04:21 -01:26 | 20:38 -00:33 |
| Running 4 | 05:24 | 23:00 | 04:53 +00:31 | 24:59 -01:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:05 | 28:24 | 04:33 -00:28 | 29:52 -01:28 |
| Running 5 | 05:38 | 32:29 | 05:01 +00:37 | 34:25 -01:56 |
| Rowing | 04:33 | 38:07 | 04:37 -00:04 | 39:26 -01:19 |
| Running 6 | 05:24 | 42:40 | 04:55 +00:29 | 44:03 -01:23 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:29 | 48:04 | 01:59 +00:30 | 48:58 -00:54 |
| Running 7 | 05:17 | 50:33 | 04:53 +00:24 | 50:57 -00:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:57 | 55:50 | 04:28 -00:31 | 55:50 +00:00 |
| Running 8 | 06:07 | 59:47 | 05:18 +00:49 | 01:00:18 -00:31 |
| Wall Balls | 04:22 | 01:05:54 | 05:40 -01:18 | 01:05:36 +00:18 |
| Roxzone | 06:53 | 01:17:02 | 05:46 +01:07 | 01:17:02 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is evident that Mitchel excelled in certain segments, such as Running 1, Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Burpees Broad Jump, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls, where he performed faster than the average time. However, there were also areas where he struggled, including Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, Running 8, Farmers Carry, and Roxzone.
Overall, Mitchel Van Hoof had a solid performance in the Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running performance, reducing time spent in the roxzone, and continuing to prioritize strength training, he can further enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Petrowski Kevin | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:17:10 | |
| Morales Matthew | 2024 Anaheim | 01:16:53 | |
| Villamar Jason | 2023 Melbourne | 01:16:50 | |
| Plante Jonathan | 2023 Malaga | 01:16:33 | |
| Moore Brandn | 2024 Houston | 01:17:28 | |
| Plier Yohan | 2024 New York | 01:17:28 | |
| Richards Jake | 2023 London | 01:16:51 | |
| Wilson Will | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:16:38 | |
| Sinervo Jaakko | 2024 Stockholm | 01:17:03 | |
| Assouline Joni | 2024 Köln | 01:16:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
