Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
61 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Pro Men
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 61 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Pro Men
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 61 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Pro Men
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of Van Bennekom Jan's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Van Bennekom Jan hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 61 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Pro Men
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Van Bennekom Jan’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Pro Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Bennekom Jan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
12:20.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 61 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Pro Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Jan Van Bennekom's performance at the 2024 Amsterdam HYROX race places him in the top 80% overall and the top 87% in his age group. His overall time was 01:58:27, with a total running time of 01:01:53, which is 08:13 slower than the average. This indicates that running is an area that requires improvement. The analysis of his splits suggests that he started the race with a strong pace but was unable to maintain it through the middle segments, indicating a potential pacing issue. His strengths lie in the strength-based exercises, particularly the Wall Balls where he excelled with a time significantly faster than average. Overall, Jan's profile leans towards being stronger in strength exercises rather than running, indicating a hybrid athlete profile with a need to focus more on running efficiency and endurance.
Segments to Improve
Total Running Time: Jan's running segments, from Running 2 to Running 5, were consistently slower than average, suggesting a need for improved endurance and pacing strategy. To enhance his running performance:
Interval Training: Incorporate intervals of varied distances and speeds to improve speed endurance. Example: 400m repeats with 1-minute rest at a pace faster than race pace.
Long, Slow Distance (LSD) Runs: Build aerobic capacity with weekly long runs at a conversational pace to improve endurance.
Tempo Runs: Integrate tempo runs at a comfortably hard pace for 20-30 minutes to increase lactate threshold.
Roxzone Transitions: His Roxzone time was slower than average, indicating a need for improved transitions. To enhance these transitions:
Transition Drills: Practice quick and efficient transitions between exercises, simulating race conditions.
High-Intensity Circuit Training: Implement circuits that mimic race exercises with minimal rest to improve overall fitness and adaptability.
Race Strategies
Pacing Strategy: Begin the race at a slightly more conservative pace to maintain energy for the middle and later running segments. Avoid the temptation to start too fast, which may lead to fatigue.
Focus on Efficiency: Work on minimizing time spent in the transition zones by rehearsing movements and setups for each exercise, ensuring smooth and efficient transitions.
Strength Maintenance: Continue to leverage strength in exercises like Wall Balls but ensure not to overexert, allowing energy conservation for running segments.