Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
437 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 437 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 437 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Vaartjes Nelly's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Vaartjes Nelly's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 437 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Vaartjes Nelly's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Vaartjes Nelly's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
04:52.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 437 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Nelly Vaartjes delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, securing an overall rank within the top 29% of participants and a 27% ranking in her age group. Her total time of 01:51:44 reflects a solid effort, particularly in strength-based activities such as the Sled Push and Sled Pull, where she performed significantly faster than average. Notably, Nelly's running times were slightly slower than average across most segments, indicating a hybrid athlete profile with room for improvement in running efficiency. Her initial running pace was strong, suggesting a slightly fast start, which tapered as the race progressed. Additionally, transitions in the Roxzone were notably slower, highlighting a potential area for strategic improvement.
Segments to Improve
Total Running Time: Nelly's overall running time was 01:38 slower than average. To enhance her running performance, she should focus on interval training to improve speed and endurance. Suggested drills include:
Interval Training: Incorporate sessions with alternating high-intensity sprints and moderate recovery periods.
Tempo Runs: Maintain a steady, challenging pace to build stamina.
Long Distance Runs: Gradually increase mileage to improve aerobic capacity.
Roxzone Transitions: Her transition time was 01:40 slower than average. Improving transition efficiency can be achieved through:
Transition Drills: Practice quick shifts between exercises with minimal rest.
Functional Circuit Training: Engage in circuits that mimic race conditions to reduce downtime.
Wall Balls: With a time 00:32 slower than average, focusing on technique and endurance is crucial. Recommended exercises:
Wall Ball Technique Drills: Emphasize form, including squat depth and ball release.
Core Strengthening: Exercises like planks and Russian twists to maintain stability during wall balls.
Sandbag Lunges and Burpees Broad Jump: These segments were slightly slower than average. To enhance performance:
Lunge Variations: Incorporate weighted lunges to build leg strength.
Plyometric Drills: Perform box jumps and broad jumps to improve explosive power.
Race Strategies
Pacing: Begin the race at a sustainably fast pace and maintain it through the mid-segments to avoid early fatigue.
Strategic Transitions: Minimize time in the Roxzone by rehearsing efficient transitions and maintaining focus.
Energy Conservation: Balance effort between strength and running segments to sustain energy throughout the race.
Mental Preparation: Develop a race day mindset to manage stress and maintain concentration during challenging segments.