Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ten Ham Anne's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ten Ham Anne's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ten Ham Anne's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ten Ham Anne's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:50 | 07:41 to 04:51 | 44.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:58 | 06:48 to 04:50 | 30.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:14 | 07:26 to 06:12 | 19.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:14 | 05:21 to 05:07 | 3.6% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 05:33 to 05:23 | 2.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:50 to 01:50 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:14 to 05:14 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:07 to 02:07 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 46:12 to 46:12 | 0.0% |
| Ten Ham Anne | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:07 | 00:00 | 05:15 -01:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:21 | 04:07 | 05:10 +00:11 | 05:15 -01:08 |
| Running 2 | 05:46 | 09:28 | 05:38 +00:08 | 10:25 -00:57 |
| Sled Push | 01:50 | 15:14 | 02:52 -01:02 | 16:03 -00:49 |
| Running 3 | 05:49 | 17:04 | 05:57 -00:08 | 18:55 -01:51 |
| Sled Pull | 05:14 | 22:53 | 06:02 -00:48 | 24:52 -01:59 |
| Running 4 | 05:52 | 28:07 | 05:58 -00:06 | 30:54 -02:47 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:26 | 33:59 | 06:33 +00:53 | 36:52 -02:53 |
| Running 5 | 06:06 | 41:25 | 06:09 -00:03 | 43:25 -02:00 |
| Rowing | 05:33 | 47:31 | 05:27 +00:06 | 49:34 -02:03 |
| Running 6 | 06:03 | 53:04 | 06:03 +00:00 | 55:01 -01:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 59:07 | 02:21 -00:14 | 01:01:04 -01:57 |
| Running 7 | 06:00 | 01:01:14 | 06:01 -00:01 | 01:03:25 -02:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:48 | 01:07:14 | 05:01 +01:47 | 01:09:26 -02:12 |
| Running 8 | 06:32 | 01:14:02 | 06:32 +00:00 | 01:14:27 -00:25 |
| Wall Balls | 07:41 | 01:20:34 | 05:13 +02:28 | 01:20:59 -00:25 |
| Roxzone | 05:25 | 01:33:33 | 07:21 -01:56 | 01:33:33 |
Anne Ten Ham delivered an impressive performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top 16% overall and top 17% in her age group. Her overall time was 01:33:33, with a total running time of 00:46:12, which is 02:04 faster than the average. This indicates a strong running profile, suggesting that Anne is more proficient in running than strength-based exercises. Her best running lap was 00:05:46, showcasing her speed and endurance. Anne started the race with a very fast first running segment, which could have contributed to fatigue in later segments. The Roxzone time was also exceptionally quick, reflecting efficient transitions and solid overall fitness.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Funk Nicola | 2018 Hamburg | 01:33:49 | |
| Zelionkiene Monika | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:33:07 | |
| Rawnsley Stephanie | 2019 New York | 01:33:06 | |
| Tiebe Winnie | 2019 Leipzig | 01:33:41 | |
| Speirs Laura | 2022 London | 01:33:53 | |
| Rodrigo Laura | 2023 Glasgow | 01:33:27 | |
| Ronka Mari | 2024 London | 01:33:52 | |
| Danishevsky Diana | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:33:24 | |
| Hardingham Jessica | 2024 Manchester | 01:33:55 | |
| Krabbenborg Linde | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:33:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
