Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Staman Hugo's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Staman Hugo's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Staman Hugo's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Staman Hugo's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:21. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:20 | 44:39 to 42:19 | 43.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:57 | 07:11 to 06:14 | 17.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:40 | 03:27 to 02:47 | 12.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:32 | 02:37 to 02:05 | 10.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:27 | 05:36 to 05:09 | 8.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:25 | 05:10 to 04:45 | 7.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Staman Hugo | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:44 | 00:00 | 04:42 -00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:04 | 03:44 | 04:28 -00:24 | 04:42 -00:58 |
| Running 2 | 05:21 | 07:48 | 05:02 +00:19 | 09:10 -01:22 |
| Sled Push | 03:27 | 13:09 | 02:57 +00:30 | 14:12 -01:03 |
| Running 3 | 05:47 | 16:36 | 05:27 +00:20 | 17:09 -00:33 |
| Sled Pull | 05:10 | 22:23 | 05:02 +00:08 | 22:36 -00:13 |
| Running 4 | 05:41 | 27:33 | 05:27 +00:14 | 27:38 -00:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:36 | 33:14 | 05:24 +00:12 | 33:05 +00:09 |
| Running 5 | 05:55 | 38:50 | 05:38 +00:17 | 38:29 +00:21 |
| Rowing | 04:24 | 44:45 | 04:52 -00:28 | 44:07 +00:38 |
| Running 6 | 05:44 | 49:09 | 05:30 +00:14 | 48:59 +00:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:37 | 54:53 | 02:13 +00:24 | 54:29 +00:24 |
| Running 7 | 05:45 | 57:30 | 05:28 +00:17 | 56:42 +00:48 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:55 | 01:03:15 | 05:12 -00:17 | 01:02:10 +01:05 |
| Running 8 | 06:46 | 01:08:10 | 06:07 +00:39 | 01:07:22 +00:48 |
| Wall Balls | 07:11 | 01:14:56 | 06:38 +00:33 | 01:13:29 +01:27 |
| Roxzone | 05:10 | 01:27:07 | 07:00 -01:50 | 01:27:07 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is evident that Hugo excels in certain segments such as Running 1 and Ski Erg, where he performed significantly better than the average time. This indicates that he has a good level of cardiovascular endurance and strength. However, he struggled in segments like Burpees Broad Jump, Running 8, Wall Balls, and Running 2, where he lost considerable time compared to the average.
In conclusion, Hugo Staman had a solid performance in the Hyrox race in Amsterdam. By focusing on improving specific segments such as Burpees Broad Jump, Running 8, Wall Balls, and Running 2, he can further enhance his overall performance. Implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, along with effective race strategies, can help him achieve his goals and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Birchall Michael | 2024 Manchester | 01:27:31 | |
| Schreiber Patrick | 2023 München | 01:27:11 | |
| Cattanach Christopher | 2023 Glasgow | 01:27:30 | |
| Pokorny Michael | 2021 New York | 01:26:40 | |
| Przybylak Zibby | 2023 Barcelona | 01:26:57 | |
| Mathot Ed | 2023 Dubai | 01:26:58 | |
| Mccowan Grant | 2023 Glasgow | 01:27:25 | |
| Martnez Garca Francisco | 2023 Malaga | 01:27:31 | |
| Hooff Gero | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:26:56 | |
| Pferner René | 2023 München | 01:26:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Stockholm | 01:26:57 | |
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:25:26 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:23:39 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
