Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 191 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Smith Edyta's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Smith Edyta's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Smith Edyta's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Smith Edyta's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:19. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:26 | 36:24 to 34:58 | 33.2% |
| Wall Balls | 01:02 | 05:29 to 04:27 | 23.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:33 | 03:17 to 02:44 | 12.7% |
| Rowing | 00:24 | 05:01 to 04:37 | 9.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:24 | 04:12 to 03:48 | 9.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:19 | 02:12 to 01:53 | 7.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:08 | 03:41 to 03:33 | 3.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:28 to 04:25 | 1.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Smith Edyta | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:06 | 00:00 | 04:02 -00:56 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 03:06 | 04:33 -00:05 | 04:02 -00:56 |
| Running 2 | 04:30 | 07:34 | 04:16 +00:14 | 08:35 -01:01 |
| Sled Push | 03:17 | 12:04 | 03:16 +00:01 | 12:51 -00:47 |
| Running 3 | 04:37 | 15:21 | 04:35 +00:02 | 16:07 -00:46 |
| Sled Pull | 04:14 | 19:58 | 05:07 -00:53 | 20:42 -00:44 |
| Running 4 | 04:44 | 24:12 | 04:33 +00:11 | 25:49 -01:37 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:41 | 28:56 | 04:00 -00:19 | 30:22 -01:26 |
| Running 5 | 04:44 | 32:37 | 04:39 +00:05 | 34:22 -01:45 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 37:21 | 04:45 +00:16 | 39:01 -01:40 |
| Running 6 | 04:49 | 42:22 | 04:35 +00:14 | 43:46 -01:24 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:12 | 47:11 | 02:05 +00:07 | 48:21 -01:10 |
| Running 7 | 04:47 | 49:23 | 04:37 +00:10 | 50:26 -01:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:12 | 54:10 | 04:07 +00:05 | 55:03 -00:53 |
| Running 8 | 05:09 | 58:22 | 04:51 +00:18 | 59:10 -00:48 |
| Wall Balls | 05:29 | 01:03:31 | 05:03 +00:26 | 01:04:01 -00:30 |
| Roxzone | 04:58 | 01:13:52 | 04:48 +00:10 | 01:13:52 |
Edyta Smith delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam HYROX PRO race. Ranking 57th overall and 34th in her age group, she is solidly positioned in the top 14% and 37% respectively. Her total running time of 00:36:24 was impressive, as it was 13 seconds faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. Yet, her running splits suggest she might have started too fast, particularly in Running 1 where she was significantly faster than average, potentially impacting her pacing in later stages. This suggests a need to balance her high running capability with strength elements to achieve a more hybrid athletic profile.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gerstenberger Sophia | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:13:48 | |
| Hawley Alyssa | 2019 New York | 01:13:40 | |
| Deldaele Charlotte | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:13:35 | |
| Lopes Demi | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:14:02 | |
| Guidry Karyn | 2024 Dallas | 01:13:33 | |
| Digby Jodie | 2024 Birmingham | 01:13:52 | |
| Millán Mattern Ana | 2023 Valencia | 01:13:31 | |
| Stawczynski Louisa | 2024 Hamburg | 01:13:23 | |
| Bland K | 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:13:56 | |
| Rohse Olivia | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:13:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:15:55 | |
| 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:17:58 | |
| 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:22:38 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
