Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:55 (From 40:58 to 39:03) | 42.3% |
| BBJ | 01:22 (From 05:47 to 04:25) | 30.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:47 (From 03:13 to 02:26) | 17.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:22 (From 04:34 to 04:12) | 8.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 (From 04:19 to 04:15) | 1.5% |
| Rowing | 00:02 (From 04:37 to 04:35) | 0.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 01:42 to 01:42) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 04:15 to 04:15) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 05:06 to 05:06) | 0.0% |
| Skinner Joe | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:10 | 00:00 | 04:22 -00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 04:10 | 04:21 -00:02 | 04:22 -00:12 |
| Running 2 | 05:06 | 08:29 | 04:42 +00:24 | 08:43 -00:14 |
| Sled Push | 03:13 | 13:35 | 02:43 +00:30 | 13:25 +00:10 |
| Running 3 | 05:15 | 16:48 | 05:05 +00:10 | 16:08 +00:40 |
| Sled Pull | 04:34 | 22:03 | 04:33 +00:01 | 21:13 +00:50 |
| Running 4 | 05:34 | 26:37 | 05:04 +00:30 | 25:46 +00:51 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:47 | 32:11 | 04:48 +00:59 | 30:50 +01:21 |
| Running 5 | 05:24 | 37:58 | 05:13 +00:11 | 35:38 +02:20 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 43:22 | 04:40 -00:03 | 40:51 +02:31 |
| Running 6 | 05:00 | 47:59 | 05:05 -00:05 | 45:31 +02:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:42 | 52:59 | 02:02 -00:20 | 50:36 +02:23 |
| Running 7 | 05:11 | 54:41 | 05:04 +00:07 | 52:38 +02:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:15 | 59:52 | 04:40 -00:25 | 57:42 +02:10 |
| Running 8 | 05:23 | 01:04:07 | 05:33 -00:10 | 01:02:22 +01:45 |
| Wall Balls | 05:06 | 01:09:30 | 05:53 -00:47 | 01:07:55 +01:35 |
| Roxzone | 05:27 | 01:19:55 | 06:07 -00:40 | 01:19:55 |
Joe's best running lap was 00:04:10, which was 00:04 faster than the average. However, he struggled in some segments, such as Running 2, Running 4, Burpees Broad Jump, and Running 5, where he lost significant time compared to the average.
Training Strategies:
1. Interval Training: Incorporate interval training sessions into Joe's training routine. This can involve alternating between periods of high-intensity running and recovery periods of lower intensity. For example, he can try 400-meter repeats at a faster pace, followed by a slower recovery jog, and repeat for several sets.
2. Strength Training: Joe should focus on building strength in his lower body to improve his running performance. Exercises such as squats, lunges, deadlifts, and plyometric movements like box jumps can help develop the necessary power and explosiveness.
3. Endurance Training: To improve his overall endurance, Joe should incorporate longer distance runs into his training routine. Gradually increasing the distance and duration of his runs will help build the stamina needed for the race.
4. Transition Training: Since Joe's roxzone time was faster than average, he should continue to work on his overall fitness and transition time. Implementing circuit training, which combines different exercises and transitions, can help improve his efficiency during the race.
- Prioritize Strength: Given that Joe's total running time was slower than average, he should prioritize his strength training to improve his overall race performance. By focusing on building strength, he can compensate for any potential weaknesses in the running segments.
- Mental Preparation: Joe should mentally prepare himself for the challenging segments, such as Burpees Broad Jump, where he lost significant time. Visualizing success and developing strategies to tackle these segments can help him perform better during the race.
In conclusion, Joe Skinner had a strong overall performance in the HYROX race, with notable strengths in certain segments. However, there are specific areas for improvement, such as Running 2, Running 4, Burpees Broad Jump, and Running 5. By implementing the suggested training strategies, focusing on interval and strength training, and following the race strategies, Joe can enhance his performance in these areas and improve his overall race results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ayerra Marcos | 2023 Bilbao | 01:19:37 | |
| Faiardi Simone | 2023 Milan | 01:20:17 | |
| Page Dan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:16 | |
| Mathieu Valentin | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:19:35 | |
| Seriref Mohamed | 2024 Paris | 01:19:49 | |
| Kinnard Benjamin | 2022 London | 01:19:25 | |
| Fameree Brad | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:19:49 | |
| Van Der Vlugt Rick | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:19:38 | |
| Losch Michael | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:19:50 | |
| Mclaren Elliott | 2024 Glasgow | 01:19:46 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Barcelona Skinner Joe | 01:27:44 | |
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London Skinner Joe, Cooper Ian | 01:08:05 | |
| 2024 Glasgow Sanders Jake, Skinner Joe | 01:10:13 | |
| 2023 London Skinner Joe, Jones Liam | 01:07:32 | |
| 2023 London Skinner Joe, Grounds Ben | 01:12:20 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Skinner Joe
