Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Scannell Thomas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Scannell Thomas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Scannell Thomas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Scannell Thomas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:26 | 47:05 to 40:39 | 85.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:32 | 05:10 to 04:38 | 7.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:21 | 06:09 to 05:48 | 4.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:10 to 01:59 | 2.4% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:44 to 04:40 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:36 to 01:36 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:01 to 03:01 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 02:38 to 02:38 | 0.0% |
| Scannell Thomas | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:02 | 00:00 | 04:31 +00:31 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:10 | 05:02 | 04:24 -00:14 | 04:31 +00:31 |
| Running 2 | 05:27 | 09:12 | 04:52 +00:35 | 08:55 +00:17 |
| Sled Push | 01:36 | 14:39 | 02:51 -01:15 | 13:47 +00:52 |
| Running 3 | 05:45 | 16:15 | 05:17 +00:28 | 16:38 -00:23 |
| Sled Pull | 03:01 | 22:00 | 04:47 -01:46 | 21:55 +00:05 |
| Running 4 | 05:49 | 25:01 | 05:15 +00:34 | 26:42 -01:41 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:38 | 30:50 | 05:05 -02:27 | 31:57 -01:07 |
| Running 5 | 06:07 | 33:28 | 05:25 +00:42 | 37:02 -03:34 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 39:35 | 04:45 -00:01 | 42:27 -02:52 |
| Running 6 | 06:06 | 44:19 | 05:17 +00:49 | 47:12 -02:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 50:25 | 02:08 +00:02 | 52:29 -02:04 |
| Running 7 | 05:51 | 52:35 | 05:16 +00:35 | 54:37 -02:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:10 | 58:26 | 04:56 +00:14 | 59:53 -01:27 |
| Running 8 | 07:00 | 01:03:36 | 05:49 +01:11 | 01:04:49 -01:13 |
| Wall Balls | 06:09 | 01:10:36 | 06:17 -00:08 | 01:10:38 -00:02 |
| Roxzone | 06:47 | 01:23:27 | 06:32 +00:15 | 01:23:27 |
Thomas' overall time of 01:23:27 was impressive, showcasing his fitness and determination throughout the race. However, there are areas where he can focus on to further improve his performance.
In conclusion, Thomas Scannell had a strong performance in the 2021 London HYROX race, placing in the top 26% overall and the top 30% in his age group. To further improve his performance, he should focus on improving his overall fitness, reducing transition times, and enhancing his running endurance, speed, and agility. By implementing specific training strategies, drills, and techniques, Thomas can continue to excel in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Chávez Ocampo Raúl Alonso | 2024 Mexico City | 01:23:13 | |
| Clarke Bem Keith | 2022 London | 01:23:21 | |
| Diaz Carlos | 2024 Turin | 01:23:54 | |
| Fredrich Christoph Tran | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:23:35 | |
| Sørensen Josef | 2024 Malaga | 01:23:55 | |
| Sifuentes Ignacio | 2024 Dallas | 01:23:00 | |
| 刘 冠宏 | 2024 Beijing | 01:23:15 | |
| Roques Christophe | 2023 Paris | 01:23:04 | |
| Steinke Daniel | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:23:33 | |
| Smaali Nasser | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:23:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 London | 01:25:34 | |
| 2023 London | 01:27:33 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
