Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 738 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Pijnenburg Gwen's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Pijnenburg Gwen's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Pijnenburg Gwen's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Pijnenburg Gwen's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:18 | 05:30 to 03:12 | 44.7% |
| Run Total | 01:34 | 39:47 to 38:13 | 30.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:35 | 04:45 to 04:10 | 11.3% |
| Rowing | 00:23 | 05:14 to 04:51 | 7.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:15 | 03:47 to 03:32 | 4.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:42 to 04:38 | 1.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:57 to 01:57 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:38 to 01:38 | 0.0% |
| Pijnenburg Gwen | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:21 | 00:00 | 04:27 -01:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 03:21 | 04:49 -00:07 | 04:27 -01:06 |
| Running 2 | 05:01 | 08:03 | 04:46 +00:15 | 09:16 -01:13 |
| Sled Push | 01:57 | 13:04 | 02:23 -00:26 | 14:02 -00:58 |
| Running 3 | 05:01 | 15:01 | 05:00 +00:01 | 16:25 -01:24 |
| Sled Pull | 04:01 | 20:02 | 04:43 -00:42 | 21:25 -01:23 |
| Running 4 | 05:06 | 24:03 | 05:00 +00:06 | 26:08 -02:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:45 | 29:09 | 04:45 +00:00 | 31:08 -01:59 |
| Running 5 | 05:14 | 33:54 | 05:06 +00:08 | 35:53 -01:59 |
| Rowing | 05:14 | 39:08 | 05:03 +00:11 | 40:59 -01:51 |
| Running 6 | 05:14 | 44:22 | 05:02 +00:12 | 46:02 -01:40 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:38 | 49:36 | 01:58 -00:20 | 51:04 -01:28 |
| Running 7 | 05:14 | 51:14 | 05:01 +00:13 | 53:02 -01:48 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:47 | 56:28 | 03:51 -00:04 | 58:03 -01:35 |
| Running 8 | 05:40 | 01:00:15 | 05:18 +00:22 | 01:01:54 -01:39 |
| Wall Balls | 05:30 | 01:05:55 | 03:54 +01:36 | 01:07:12 -01:17 |
| Roxzone | 05:12 | 01:16:28 | 05:22 -00:10 | 01:16:28 |
Gwen Pijnenburg delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox, achieving an overall rank of 77 and placing 16th in her age group. This places her in the top 2% of both the overall and age-specific categories, showcasing her competitive edge. Her total running time was notably 27 seconds faster than average, indicating a strong runner profile. However, a deeper analysis reveals that her pacing might need adjustment. She started exceptionally fast during the initial segments, particularly in Running 1, which could have affected her endurance in later stages, as evidenced by slower times in the subsequent running segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Moore Lauren | 2023 London | 01:16:26 | |
| Von Känel Nicole | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:16:53 | |
| Emanuelson Michoe | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:16:00 | |
| Tenorio Santana | 2023 Dallas | 01:16:23 | |
| June Vivian | 2024 New York | 01:16:03 | |
| Boden Claire | 2024 Manchester | 01:16:05 | |
| Bakker Filippa | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:16:54 | |
| Wray Kate | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:16:06 | |
| Rawlinson Lucy | 2024 Manchester | 01:16:06 | |
| Lemaire Justine | 2024 Marseille | 01:16:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
