Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Oosterloo David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Oosterloo David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Oosterloo David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Oosterloo David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:55. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:41 | 05:55 to 04:14 | 43.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:19 | 05:33 to 04:14 | 33.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:29 | 02:18 to 01:49 | 12.3% |
| Run Total | 00:13 | 38:31 to 38:18 | 5.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 04:18 to 04:13 | 2.1% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:36 to 04:32 | 1.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:04 | 05:18 to 05:14 | 1.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:20 to 02:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:53 to 03:53 | 0.0% |
| Oosterloo David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:45 | 00:00 | 04:19 +00:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 04:45 | 04:20 -00:02 | 04:19 +00:26 |
| Running 2 | 04:29 | 09:03 | 04:37 -00:08 | 08:39 +00:24 |
| Sled Push | 02:20 | 13:32 | 02:40 -00:20 | 13:16 +00:16 |
| Running 3 | 04:48 | 15:52 | 05:00 -00:12 | 15:56 -00:04 |
| Sled Pull | 03:53 | 20:40 | 04:27 -00:34 | 20:56 -00:16 |
| Running 4 | 04:51 | 24:33 | 04:59 -00:08 | 25:23 -00:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:33 | 29:24 | 04:39 +00:54 | 30:22 -00:58 |
| Running 5 | 05:01 | 34:57 | 05:08 -00:07 | 35:01 -00:04 |
| Rowing | 04:36 | 39:58 | 04:39 -00:03 | 40:09 -00:11 |
| Running 6 | 05:01 | 44:34 | 05:01 +00:00 | 44:48 -00:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 49:35 | 02:01 +00:17 | 49:49 -00:14 |
| Running 7 | 04:35 | 51:53 | 05:00 -00:25 | 51:50 +00:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:55 | 56:28 | 04:35 +01:20 | 56:50 -00:22 |
| Running 8 | 05:04 | 01:02:23 | 05:26 -00:22 | 01:01:25 +00:58 |
| Wall Balls | 05:18 | 01:07:27 | 05:45 -00:27 | 01:06:51 +00:36 |
| Roxzone | 05:55 | 01:18:32 | 05:56 -00:01 | 01:18:32 |
David Oosterloo delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne HYROX event, finishing in the top 16% overall and within the top 17% of his age group. His total running time was 1:24 faster than the average, indicating a strong running proficiency. The fact that his best running lap was 00:04:29 demonstrates his capability to maintain an impressive pace. However, his initial running split was slower than average, suggesting a slightly conservative start. Based on his running and strength performances, David shows a hybrid profile with a slight edge in running but room for improvement in strength-based exercises.
David was 1:23 slower than average in this segment. This suggests the need to enhance leg endurance and lunge technique.
David was 1:01 slower than average, indicating a need for improved explosive power and transition efficiency.
His transition times were 11 seconds slower than average, indicating room for efficiency improvements.
David was 17 seconds slower than average, suggesting a need to enhance grip strength and carrying efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lott Greg | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:18:49 | |
| Welsch Markus | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:19:01 | |
| Maestre Santa Alvaro | 2023 Valencia | 01:18:31 | |
| Vestbirk Lars | 2024 Malaga | 01:18:58 | |
| Sullivan Darragh | 2023 London | 01:18:40 | |
| Mazur Timothy | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:18:37 | |
| Cooper Peter | 2023 Dublin | 01:18:44 | |
| Nix Austin | 2023 Dallas | 01:18:09 | |
| Dyer Adrian | 2023 Sydney | 01:18:49 | |
| Vercruysse Gerd | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:18:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
