Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 815 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nauts Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nauts Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nauts Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nauts Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:50 | 35:35 to 33:45 | 57.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:27 | 03:56 to 03:29 | 14.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:25 | 04:25 to 04:00 | 13.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:21 | 03:37 to 03:16 | 10.9% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 04:26 to 04:17 | 4.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:42 to 01:42 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:14 to 03:14 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:14 to 01:14 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Nauts Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:54 | 00:00 | 03:47 -00:53 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 02:54 | 04:07 +00:18 | 03:47 -00:53 |
| Running 2 | 04:14 | 07:19 | 04:00 +00:14 | 07:54 -00:35 |
| Sled Push | 01:42 | 11:33 | 02:20 -00:38 | 11:54 -00:21 |
| Running 3 | 04:36 | 13:15 | 04:16 +00:20 | 14:14 -00:59 |
| Sled Pull | 03:14 | 17:51 | 03:39 -00:25 | 18:30 -00:39 |
| Running 4 | 04:30 | 21:05 | 04:15 +00:15 | 22:09 -01:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:37 | 25:35 | 03:34 +00:03 | 26:24 -00:49 |
| Running 5 | 04:51 | 29:12 | 04:21 +00:30 | 29:58 -00:46 |
| Rowing | 04:26 | 34:03 | 04:21 +00:05 | 34:19 -00:16 |
| Running 6 | 04:33 | 38:29 | 04:17 +00:16 | 38:40 -00:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:14 | 43:02 | 01:41 -00:27 | 42:57 +00:05 |
| Running 7 | 04:37 | 44:16 | 04:17 +00:20 | 44:38 -00:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:56 | 48:53 | 03:42 +00:14 | 48:55 -00:02 |
| Running 8 | 05:24 | 52:49 | 04:33 +00:51 | 52:37 +00:12 |
| Wall Balls | 04:15 | 58:13 | 04:37 -00:22 | 57:10 +01:03 |
| Roxzone | 03:59 | 01:06:20 | 04:33 -00:34 | 01:06:20 |
Mark Nauts delivered an impressive performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, ranking 85th overall and 20th in his age group, placing him in the top 2% and 3% respectively. His overall time was 1:06:20, and although his total running time was 35:35, which is 1:24 slower than the average, he exhibited strong performances in several strength-based exercises, highlighting a well-rounded athlete profile. Mark started the race quite fast, especially evident in his Running 1 split, which was 50 seconds faster than average. This suggests a slightly aggressive start, which may have influenced fatigue in subsequent running splits. His balanced strength and endurance capabilities suggest he possesses a hybrid athlete profile, but there is potential for improvement in running efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Revell Tony | 2022 London | 01:06:01 | |
| Davies Andrew | 2022 Birmingham | 01:06:25 | |
| Fall Robin | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:06:44 | |
| Dietrich Sven | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:06:47 | |
| Horobei Kristian | 2024 Poznan | 01:05:57 | |
| Ailam Farid | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:06:45 | |
| Hendrie Charlie | 2023 Birmingham | 01:06:00 | |
| Lecieux Thomas | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:05:55 | |
| Berak Robert | 2024 Marseille | 01:06:35 | |
| Jose Gonzalvo Albert | 2024 Milan | 01:06:34 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Copenhagen | 01:13:34 | |
| 2024 Malaga | 01:13:34 | |
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:13:56 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt | 01:10:17 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
